Lawler-Neville T L, Shellito S M, Maddock T D, Bauer M L, Lardy G P, Gilbery T C, Caton J S
Animal and Range Sciences Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2006 Aug;84(8):2232-42. doi: 10.2527/jas.2005-765.
In Exp. 1, 4 ruminally and duodenally cannulated beef steers (444.0 +/- 9.8 kg) were used in a 4 x 4 Latin square with a 2 x 2 factorial treatment arrangement to evaluate the effects of forage type (alfalfa or corn stover) and concentrated separator byproduct (CSB) supplementation (0 or 10% of dietary DM) on intake, site of digestion, and microbial efficiency. In Exp. 2, 5 wethers (44 +/- 1.5 kg) were used in a 5 x 5 Latin square to evaluate the effects of CSB on intake, digestion, and N balance. Treatments were 0, 10, and 20% CSB (DM basis) mixed with forage; 10% CSB offered separately from the forage; and a urea control, in which urea was added to the forage at equal N compared with the 10% CSB treatment. In Exp. 1, intakes of OM and N (g/kg of BW) were greater (P < 0.01) for steers fed alfalfa compared with corn stover. Steers fed 10% CSB had greater (P < 0.08) OM and N intakes (g/kg of BW) compared with 0% CSB-fed steers. Total duodenal, microbial, and nonmicrobial flows of OM and N were greater (P < 0.01) for steers fed alfalfa compared with corn stover. Steers fed 10% CSB had increased (P = 0.02) duodenal microbial flow (N and OM) compared with 0% CSB-fed steers. Forage x CSB interactions (P < 0.01) existed for total tract N digestibility; alfalfa with or without CSB was similar (67.4 vs. 69.5), whereas corn stover with CSB was greater than corn stover without CSB (31.9 vs. -23.9%). True ruminal OM digestion was greater (P < 0.09) in steers fed alfalfa vs. corn stover (73.0 vs. 63.1%) and in steers fed 10 vs. 0% CSB (70.3 vs. 65.8%). Microbial efficiency was unaffected (P > 0.25) by forage type or CSB supplementation. In Exp. 2, forage and total intake increased (linear; P < 0.01) as CSB increased and were greater (P < 0.04) in 10% CSB mixed with forage compared with 10% CSB fed separately. Feeding 10% CSB separately resulted in similar DM and OM apparent total tract digestibility compared with 10% CSB fed mixed. Increasing CSB led to an increase (linear; P < 0.02) in DM, OM, apparent N digestion, and water intake. Nitrogen balance (g and percentage of N intake) increased (linear; P < 0.08) with CSB addition. Feeding 10% CSB separately resulted in greater (P < 0.01) N balance compared with 10% CSB fed mixed. Using urea resulted in similar (P = 0.30) N balance compared with 10% CSB fed mixed. Inclusion of CSB improves intake, digestion, and increases microbial N production in ruminants fed forage-based diets.
在实验1中,选用4头安装了瘤胃和十二指肠瘘管的肉牛(体重444.0±9.8千克),采用4×4拉丁方设计,结合2×2析因处理安排,以评估饲草类型(苜蓿或玉米秸秆)和添加浓缩分离副产品(CSB)(占日粮干物质的0%或10%)对采食量、消化部位和微生物效率的影响。在实验2中,选用5只阉羊(体重44±1.5千克),采用5×5拉丁方设计,评估CSB对采食量、消化和氮平衡的影响。处理方式包括:0%、10%和20%的CSB(以干物质计)与饲草混合;10%的CSB与饲草分开投喂;以及一个尿素对照组,即按与10%CSB处理相同的氮含量向饲草中添加尿素。在实验1中,与饲喂玉米秸秆的肉牛相比,饲喂苜蓿的肉牛干物质和氮的采食量(克/千克体重)更高(P<0.01)。与饲喂0%CSB的肉牛相比,饲喂10%CSB的肉牛干物质和氮的采食量(克/千克体重)更高(P<0.08)。与饲喂玉米秸秆的肉牛相比,饲喂苜蓿的肉牛十二指肠、微生物和非微生物的干物质和氮总流量更高(P<0.01)。与饲喂0%CSB的肉牛相比,饲喂10%CSB的肉牛十二指肠微生物流量(氮和干物质)增加(P=0.02)。全肠道氮消化率存在饲草×CSB互作效应(P<0.01);添加或不添加CSB的苜蓿相似(67.4%对69.5%),而添加CSB的玉米秸秆高于未添加CSB的玉米秸秆(31.9%对-23.9%)。饲喂苜蓿的肉牛瘤胃真干物质消化率高于饲喂玉米秸秆的肉牛(P<0.09)(73.0%对63.1%),饲喂10%CSB的肉牛高于饲喂0%CSB的肉牛(70.3%对65.8%)。饲草类型或CSB添加对微生物效率无影响(P>0.25)。在实验2中,随着CSB添加量增加,饲草采食量和总采食量呈线性增加(P<0.01),与10%CSB单独投喂相比,10%CSB与饲草混合投喂时采食量更高(P<0.04)。10%CSB单独投喂时的干物质和干物质表观全肠道消化率与10%CSB混合投喂时相似。增加CSB添加量导致干物质、干物质、表观氮消化率和饮水量呈线性增加(P<0.02)。添加CSB后氮平衡(克和氮摄入量的百分比)呈线性增加(P<0.08)。10%CSB单独投喂时的氮平衡高于10%CSB混合投喂时(P<0.01)。使用尿素时的氮平衡与10%CSB混合投喂时相似(P=0.30)。在以饲草为基础日粮的反刍动物中,添加CSB可提高采食量、消化率并增加微生物氮产量。