Kropf S Petraglia
Casa de Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Parassitologia. 2005 Dec;47(3-4):379-86.
The present paper discusses the historical construction and legitimacy of Chagas disease as a distinct nosological entity and as a public health issue in Brazil. It focuses on the activities of a group of researchers from Oswaldo Cruz Institute who worked at the Centre for the Study and Prevention of Chagas disease, located in Bambuí, Minas Gerais. Led in the 1940s and 50s by Emmanuel Dias, disciple of Carlos Chagas, the group made important contributions to the clinical characterization of Chagas disease as a cardiac illness, established the fact that it was technically possible to control the disease by using residual insecticides, and engaged in intense political mobilization to have the disease included as part of the Health Ministry sanitation campaigns. My hypothesis is that the group's work was a determining factor in the overcoming of certain unresolved controversies that had surrounded the medical and social identity of the disease since the 1920s. I examine to what extent this process was directly linked both to post-war optimism over new possibilities of combating infectious diseases and to the national and international debate on the relation between health and economic and social development.
本文探讨了恰加斯病作为一种独特的病种实体以及作为巴西公共卫生问题的历史建构与合法性。它聚焦于来自奥斯瓦尔多·克鲁兹研究所的一群研究人员的活动,他们在位于米纳斯吉拉斯州班布伊的恰加斯病研究与预防中心工作。在20世纪40年代和50年代,由卡洛斯·恰加斯的弟子伊曼纽尔·迪亚斯领导,该团队对恰加斯病作为一种心脏疾病的临床特征做出了重要贡献,确立了使用残留杀虫剂在技术上可以控制该疾病这一事实,并进行了激烈的政治动员以使该疾病被纳入卫生部的卫生运动之中。我的假设是,该团队的工作是克服自20世纪20年代以来围绕该疾病的医学和社会身份的某些未解决争议的决定性因素。我考察了这一过程在多大程度上既与战后对战胜传染病新可能性的乐观态度直接相关,又与关于健康与经济及社会发展之间关系的国内和国际辩论直接相关。