Schömig Albert, Ndrepepa Gjin, Kastrati Adnan
Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität, Lazarettstrasse 36, Munich, Germany.
Eur Heart J. 2006 Aug;27(16):1900-7. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl174. Epub 2006 Jul 25.
The prevailing opinion in the reperfusion therapy of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is that the benefit of reperfusion is mostly confined to the first 12 h after the symptom onset. This opinion is based on the results of the prior megatrials of thrombolytic therapy and the experimental studies. Thrombolytic studies have unequivocally proven that the efficacy of thrombolysis to salvage ischaemic myocardium is drastically reduced with the increase in the time-to-treatment interval. A relatively large number of patients present beyond the limit efficacy of thrombolysis and are considered ineligible for this reperfusion modality. Recent experimental and clinical evidence indicates that a large amount of viable myocardium is still present in the area at risk in patients with AMI presenting late after symptom onset and considered ineligible for thrombolysis. In this review, we summarized the existing data demonstrating that this viable myocardium is salvageable given the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is used as a reperfusion therapy. By emphasizing this fact, we do not mean to contest the concept of time dependence of myocardial necrosis following coronary occlusion and time dependence of efficacy of interventions performed early (within 2-3 h) after symptom onset or to dissuade the early coronary interventions in patients with AMI. Instead, we strongly recommend the primary PCI in patients with AMI presenting late after onset of myocardial ischaemia.
急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者再灌注治疗的主流观点是,再灌注的益处大多局限于症状发作后的前12小时。这一观点基于先前溶栓治疗的大型试验结果和实验研究。溶栓研究明确证明,随着治疗时间间隔的增加,溶栓挽救缺血心肌的疗效会大幅降低。相当多的患者就诊时已超出溶栓的有效时限,被认为不适合这种再灌注方式。最近的实验和临床证据表明,症状发作较晚且被认为不适合溶栓的AMI患者,其梗死相关区域仍存在大量存活心肌。在本综述中,我们总结了现有数据,表明如果采用直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)作为再灌注治疗,这些存活心肌是可以挽救的。强调这一事实,我们并非要质疑冠状动脉闭塞后心肌坏死的时间依赖性概念以及症状发作后早期(2 - 3小时内)进行干预的疗效的时间依赖性,也不是要劝阻对AMI患者进行早期冠状动脉干预。相反,我们强烈建议对心肌缺血发作较晚的AMI患者进行直接PCI治疗。