Lidierth Malcolm
King's College London, Hodgkin Building, Guy's Hospital Campus, London SE1 1UL, UK.
J Physiol. 2006 Oct 1;576(Pt 1):309-27. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.110577. Epub 2006 Jul 27.
Two types of dorsal root potential (DRP) were found in the spinal cord of urethane-anaesthetized rats. Local DRPs with short latency-to-onset were evoked on roots close to the point of entry of an afferent volley. Diffuse DRPs with a longer latency-to-onset were seen on more distant roots up to 17 segments from the volley entry zone. The switch to long latency-to-onset occurred abruptly as a function of distance along the cord and could not be explained by conduction delays within the dorsal columns. Long-latency DRPs were also present and superimposed on the short-latency DRPs on nearby roots. Both local and diffuse DRPs were evoked by light mechanical stimuli: von Frey hair thresholds were <or= 1 gram force Changes in excitability of the terminals of sural nerve afferents were used to confirm that both local and diffuse DRPs were associated with primary afferent depolarization (PAD). These effects were potent: the area of the antidromic volley evoked in the sural nerve by intraspinal microstimulation in the L4/5 spinal segment was increased by 109 +/- 50% (mean +/- s.d.; n = 5) by nearby conditioning stimuli, and by 52 +/- 12% (n = 6) with stimuli applied 9-13 mm (5-8 segments) away. The time course of the changes in terminal excitability closely matched those of the DRPs. Reduction of the field potentials evoked in the dorsal horn by stimulation of dorsal roots was also shown to accompany both local and diffuse DRPs. The area of the monosynaptically evoked field potential was reduced by 48 +/- 19% (n = 7) with nearby conditioning stimulation and 16 +/- 9% (n = 10) with stimulation 9-12 mm distant. Evidence is presented that this inhibition includes a presynaptic component. Similar effects were seen with field potentials evoked by sural nerve stimulation. It is concluded that diffuse DRPs are mediated through propriospinal networks which may contribute to the gating of sensory information flow during natural behaviour as they respond to weak mechanical stimuli and provoke presynaptic inhibition.
在氨基甲酸乙酯麻醉的大鼠脊髓中发现了两种类型的背根电位(DRP)。在靠近传入冲动进入点的神经根上诱发了潜伏期短的局部DRP。在距离冲动进入区最远达17个节段的更远的神经根上观察到潜伏期较长的弥漫性DRP。随着沿脊髓距离的变化,向长潜伏期的转变突然发生,并且不能用背柱内的传导延迟来解释。长潜伏期DRP也存在并叠加在附近神经根的短潜伏期DRP上。局部和弥漫性DRP均由轻度机械刺激诱发:von Frey毛发阈值≤1克力。使用腓肠神经传入纤维终末兴奋性的变化来证实局部和弥漫性DRP均与初级传入去极化(PAD)有关。这些作用很强:通过L4/5脊髓节段内脊髓微刺激在腓肠神经中诱发的逆向冲动面积,在附近施加条件刺激时增加了109±50%(平均值±标准差;n=5),在距离9-13毫米(5-8个节段)处施加刺激时增加了52±12%(n=6)。终末兴奋性变化的时间进程与DRP的时间进程密切匹配。还显示,刺激背根在背角诱发的场电位的降低与局部和弥漫性DRP均相伴。在附近施加条件刺激时,单突触诱发场电位的面积减少了48±19%(n=7),在距离9-12毫米处施加刺激时减少了16±9%(n=10)。有证据表明这种抑制包括一个突触前成分。在腓肠神经刺激诱发的场电位中也观察到了类似的效应。得出的结论是,弥漫性DRP是通过脊髓固有网络介导的,在自然行为中,由于它们对弱机械刺激有反应并引发突触前抑制,可能有助于感觉信息流的门控。