Kim Ki-Hyun, Ahn Ji-Won, Choi Ye-Jin, Nguyen Hang T
Atmospheric Environment Laboratory, Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Sejong University, Seoul, South Korea.
J Chromatogr A. 2006 Nov 3;1132(1-2):228-33. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.07.015. Epub 2006 Jul 27.
To collect or transfer samples of airborne pollutants, tubings made of various materials are used. To analyze the reactive loss patterns of reduced sulfur compounds (RSC) in the use of tubing fittings, a series of laboratory experiments were conducted so that the concentration changes were induced by the physical contact between gas samples and tubing walls. For the purpose of this study, a total of five tubing materials were investigated in reference to silcosteel (S1) tubing: stainless steel (S2), silicone (S3), PTFE Teflon (T1), tygon (T2), and copper (C). This comparative experiment was made using gaseous standards containing equimolar concentrations of four RSCs (H(2)S, CH(3)SH, DMS, and DMDS). The loss patterns of RSC were then evaluated and compared in terms of their calibration slope values across different tubing materials. The results of this comparative analysis indicated that except for a few cases, a fairly good compatibility was seen consistently among different tubing types and different RSCs. The results generally showed that the magnitude of calibration slope values obtained from different tubing materials tend to increase with an increase in RSC molecular weights. If the results are compared between different tubing materials, a highly contrasting pattern was evident. For instance, C tubing shows significant losses of light RSCs (H(2)S and CH(3)SH), while S3 tubing experiences the large losses of DMS and DMDS. A line of evidence found in this study thus suggests that most tubing types have their unique loss mechanism for RSCs, when they contact RSCs in sample gas stream passing through the tubing walls.
为了收集或转移空气中污染物的样本,人们使用了由各种材料制成的管道。为了分析管道配件使用过程中还原硫化合物(RSC)的反应损失模式,进行了一系列实验室实验,以便通过气体样本与管道壁之间的物理接触引起浓度变化。出于本研究的目的,参照硅钢(S1)管道,共研究了五种管道材料:不锈钢(S2)、硅胶(S3)、聚四氟乙烯(T1)、泰贡(T2)和铜(C)。该对比实验使用了含有等摩尔浓度的四种RSC(H₂S、CH₃SH、DMS和DMDS)的气体标准物质。然后根据不同管道材料的校准斜率值评估和比较RSC的损失模式。该对比分析的结果表明,除了少数情况外,不同管道类型和不同RSC之间始终表现出相当好的兼容性。结果总体表明,从不同管道材料获得的校准斜率值大小往往随着RSC分子量的增加而增加。如果比较不同管道材料的结果,会发现明显的高度对比模式。例如,C管道显示出轻质RSC(H₂S和CH₃SH)的显著损失,而S3管道则出现DMS和DMDS的大量损失。因此,本研究中发现的一系列证据表明,当大多数管道类型在样品气流通过管道壁与RSC接触时,它们对RSC具有独特的损失机制。