Cordonnier Thomas, Courbaud Benoît, Franc Alain
Ecology, Systematics and Evolution Laboratory, Population and Community Ecology Research Unit, Paris XI University, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France.
J Theor Biol. 2006 Nov 7;243(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.05.028. Epub 2006 Jun 7.
Many theoretical and field studies have emphasized the impact of disturbance in the dynamics and diversity of sessile organism communities. This view is best reflected by the Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis (IDH), which states that a maximum of diversity is found in ecosystems or communities experiencing intermediate disturbance regimes or at an intermediate stage of development since the last major disturbance event. Although theoretical models based on competitive interactions tend to validate this hypothesis, a recent meta-analysis of field experiments revealed that the mono-modal relationship between disturbance and diversity might not be a general pattern. In this article, we investigate the relationship between disturbance and diversity through the study of patch models, combining two types of competitive interactions: with or without competitive hierarchy, with two mechanisms influencing colonization: negative frequency dependence in colonization rates and immigration. These combinations led to various disturbance-diversity patterns. In the model without competitive hierarchy (founder effect model), a decreasing relationship appeared to be the rule as mentioned in previous studies. In the model with competitive hierarchy, the IDH pattern was obtained for low frequency dependence and low immigration. Nevertheless, high negative frequency dependence in colonization rates led to a decreasing relationship between disturbance and diversity. In contrast, high immigration led to an increasing relationship. The coexistence window (the range of disturbance intensity allowing coexistence) was the widest for intermediate immigration rates. For random species assemblages, patterns with multiple peaks were also possible. These results highlight the fact that the mono-modal IDH pattern should not be considered a rule. Competition and colonization mechanisms have a profound impact on the relationship between disturbance and diversity.
许多理论研究和实地研究都强调了干扰对固着生物群落动态和多样性的影响。这一观点在中度干扰假说(IDH)中得到了最好的体现,该假说指出,在经历中度干扰 regime 的生态系统或群落中,或自上一次重大干扰事件以来处于发育中期阶段的生态系统或群落中,发现了最大的多样性。尽管基于竞争相互作用的理论模型倾向于验证这一假说,但最近对实地实验的一项荟萃分析表明,干扰与多样性之间的单峰关系可能并非普遍模式。在本文中,我们通过研究斑块模型来探讨干扰与多样性之间的关系,该模型结合了两种类型的竞争相互作用:有无竞争等级制度,以及两种影响定殖的机制:定殖率中的负频率依赖性和迁入。这些组合导致了各种干扰 - 多样性模式。在没有竞争等级制度的模型(奠基者效应模型)中,如先前研究中所述,递减关系似乎是规律。在具有竞争等级制度的模型中,对于低频依赖性和低迁入率,获得了 IDH 模式。然而,定殖率中的高负频率依赖性导致干扰与多样性之间呈递减关系。相比之下,高迁入率导致递增关系。共存窗口(允许共存的干扰强度范围)对于中等迁入率来说是最宽的。对于随机物种组合,具有多个峰值的模式也是可能的。这些结果突出了单峰 IDH 模式不应被视为规律这一事实。竞争和定殖机制对干扰与多样性之间的关系有深远影响。