Otten Kirsten, Geraedts Max, Kugler Christof
Zusatzstudiengang Public Health an der Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf.
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2006;100(4):275-81.
Despite the increasing burden of disease and known deficiencies of actual stroke care there is a lack of evidence-based stroke guidelines in Germany. For future guideline development and implementation in Germany, critically appraising internationally available guidelines might be useful.
To identify and evaluate published evidence-based German and English language stroke/cerebrovascular disorder guidelines using the established "German Guideline Appraisal Instrument".
Systematic literature search (published in 1992-2002) using Medline and English-/German language guideline databases. A total of 626 hits resulted in 54 guideline articles. 13 articles (from Australia, Germany, the United Kingdom, Singapore and the USA) fulfilled specific inclusion criteria (recommended for countrywide implementation, complete guidelines for prevention and/or diagnostic/treatment and/or rehabilitation). The systematic guideline appraisal consisted of a) the assessment of the methodological quality using the established "German Guideline Appraisal Instrument" attributing scores and ranking the guidelines according to their overall quality; b) the systematic documentation of appraisal using structured abstracts.
The methodological quality of "content and form" (10-17 of a total of 17 points) of the 13 guidelines was comparable. Regarding the domains of the "quality of the development process" (the guidelines achieved 4-15 of 17 points) and "guideline applicability" (0-3 of 6 points), though, the appraised guidelines varied impressively. The 6 best guidelines (> or = 25 of a total of 40 points) were characterized by explicitly linking recommendations and supporting evidence, by expert reviews of the guidelines prior to publication, and the provision of instructions for guideline implementation.
None of the 13 appraised guidelines covered all key methodological quality criteria. The analysis shows, however, that it should be possible to compile a methodologically sound stroke guideline by using those parts of the different appraised guidelines that fitted the quality criteria best.
尽管疾病负担日益加重,且实际的中风护理存在已知缺陷,但德国仍缺乏基于证据的中风指南。为了德国未来指南的制定和实施,批判性地评估国际上可获得的指南可能会有所帮助。
使用既定的“德国指南评估工具”识别和评估已发表的基于证据的德语和英语中风/脑血管疾病指南。
使用Medline以及英语/德语指南数据库进行系统的文献检索(发表于1992 - 2002年)。总共626条检索结果产生了54篇指南文章。13篇文章(来自澳大利亚、德国、英国、新加坡和美国)符合特定纳入标准(推荐在全国范围内实施,包含预防和/或诊断/治疗和/或康复的完整指南)。系统的指南评估包括:a)使用既定的“德国指南评估工具”评估方法学质量,给出分数并根据总体质量对指南进行排名;b)使用结构化摘要对评估进行系统记录。
13份指南在“内容与形式”方面的方法学质量(满分17分,得10 - 17分)相当。然而,在“制定过程质量”领域(指南得分为17分中的4 - 15分)和“指南适用性”领域(6分中的0 - 3分),评估的指南差异显著。6份最佳指南(总分40分中≥25分)的特点是明确将推荐意见与支持证据相联系、在出版前对指南进行专家评审以及提供指南实施说明。
13份评估的指南均未涵盖所有关键的方法学质量标准。然而,分析表明,通过使用不同评估指南中最符合质量标准的部分,应该有可能编制出一份方法学上合理的中风指南。