Jones Steven Huntley, Tai Sara, Evershed Kate, Knowles Rebecca, Bentall Richard
School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Bipolar Disord. 2006 Aug;8(4):362-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2006.00329.x.
Disturbances in cognition, affect, sleep and activity have been identified in bipolar disorder (BD) but little is known about the possible role of these factors in the development of the condition. We studied these variables in a familial high-risk sample.
Twenty-five children (13-19 years) of bipolar parents were compared with 22 similar aged children of age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Participants were assessed using Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Lifetime version (SADS-L) and completed self-report measures of dysfunctional attitudes, behavioural inhibition/activation, social rhythms, coping styles and subjective experience of sleep. Children completed a 7-day recording of actigraphy (sleep and activity) and a 7-day diary measuring self-esteem, positive and negative affect and reactions to positive and negative events.
Fifty-six per cent of children of bipolar parents (CBP) reported mood symptoms compared to 9% of children of control parents (CC). The CBP group had coping styles and instability of self-esteem consistent with abnormal strategies for regulating affect. Both groups also differed on sleep measures. The majority of differences observed were between CBP with a current or past mood diagnosis and CC. BD parents reported dysfunctional coping styles and (to a lesser extent) disrupted activity patterns.
A familial high-risk strategy for studying the role of psychological factors in BD is feasible and informative. This pilot study indicates that abnormal coping styles, instability of self-esteem and dysregulation of sleep may be early markers of bipolar illness. However, current findings need to be explored further in longitudinal studies to clarify which potential markers are truly predictive of BD.
双相情感障碍(BD)患者存在认知、情感、睡眠和活动方面的紊乱,但对于这些因素在该疾病发生过程中可能发挥的作用知之甚少。我们在一个家族性高风险样本中对这些变量进行了研究。
将25名双相情感障碍患者的子女(13 - 19岁)与22名年龄和性别匹配的健康对照者的子女进行比较。使用情感障碍和精神分裂症问卷-终生版(SADS-L)对参与者进行评估,并完成关于功能失调态度、行为抑制/激活、社会节律、应对方式和睡眠主观体验的自我报告测量。儿童完成了为期7天的活动记录仪记录(睡眠和活动)以及一份为期7天的日记,记录自尊、积极和消极情绪以及对积极和消极事件的反应。
双相情感障碍患者子女(CBP)中有56%报告有情绪症状,而对照者子女(CC)中这一比例为9%。CBP组的应对方式和自尊稳定性与调节情感的异常策略一致。两组在睡眠测量方面也存在差异。观察到的大多数差异存在于目前或过去有情绪诊断的CBP与CC之间。双相情感障碍患者的父母报告有功能失调的应对方式以及(程度较轻的)活动模式紊乱。
采用家族性高风险策略研究心理因素在双相情感障碍中的作用是可行且有意义的。这项初步研究表明,异常的应对方式、自尊稳定性和睡眠失调可能是双相情感障碍的早期标志。然而,目前的研究结果需要在纵向研究中进一步探索,以明确哪些潜在标志真正能够预测双相情感障碍。