Fishel Melissa L, Vasko Michael R, Kelley Mark R
Department of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology/Oncology, Herman B Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, 1044 W. Walnut, Room 302C, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Mutat Res. 2007 Jan 3;614(1-2):24-36. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2006.06.007. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
Neuronal DNA repair remains one of the most exciting areas for investigation, particularly as a means to compare the DNA repair response in mitotic (cancer) vs. post-mitotic (neuronal) cells. In addition, the role of DNA repair in neuronal cell survival and response to aging and environmental insults is of particular interest. DNA damage caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as generated by mitochondrial respiration includes altered bases, abasic sites, and single- and double-strand breaks which can be prevented by the DNA base excision repair (BER) pathway. Oxidative stress accumulates in the DNA of the human brain over time especially in the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and is proposed to play a critical role in aging and in the pathogenesis of several neurological disorders including Parkinson's disease, ALS, and Alzheimer's diseases. Because DNA damage accumulates in the mtDNA more than nuclear DNA, there is increased interest in DNA repair pathways and the consequence of DNA damage in the mitochondria of neurons. The type of damage that is most likely to occur in neuronal cells is oxidative DNA damage which is primarily removed by the BER pathway. Following the notion that the bulk of neuronal DNA damage is acquired by oxidative DNA damage and ROS, the BER pathway is a likely area of focus for neuronal studies of DNA repair. BER variations in brain aging and pathology in various brain regions and tissues are presented. Therefore, the BER pathway is discussed in greater detail in this review than other repair pathways. Other repair pathways including direct reversal, nucleotide excision repair (NER), mismatch repair (MMR), homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining are also discussed. Finally, there is a growing interest in the role that DNA repair pathways play in the clinical arena as they relate to the neurotoxicity and neuropathy associated with cancer treatments. Among the numerous side effects of cancer treatments, major clinical effects include neurocognitive dysfunction and peripheral neuropathy. These symptoms occur frequently and have not been effectively studied at the cellular or molecular level. Studies of DNA repair may help our understanding of how those cells that are not dividing could succumb to neurotoxicity with the clinical manifestations discussed in the following article.
神经元DNA修复仍然是最令人兴奋的研究领域之一,特别是作为一种比较有丝分裂(癌症)细胞与有丝分裂后(神经元)细胞中DNA修复反应的手段。此外,DNA修复在神经元细胞存活以及对衰老和环境损伤的反应中的作用尤其令人感兴趣。由线粒体呼吸产生的活性氧(ROS)引起的DNA损伤包括碱基改变、无碱基位点以及单链和双链断裂,而DNA碱基切除修复(BER)途径可以预防这些损伤。随着时间的推移,氧化应激会在人类大脑的DNA中积累,尤其是在线粒体DNA(mtDNA)中,并被认为在衰老以及包括帕金森病、肌萎缩侧索硬化症和阿尔茨海默病在内的几种神经疾病的发病机制中起关键作用。由于DNA损伤在线粒体DNA中比在核DNA中积累得更多,人们对DNA修复途径以及神经元线粒体中DNA损伤的后果越来越感兴趣。神经元细胞中最可能发生的损伤类型是氧化性DNA损伤,其主要由BER途径去除。基于大部分神经元DNA损伤是由氧化性DNA损伤和ROS导致的这一观点,BER途径很可能是神经元DNA修复研究的一个重点领域。本文介绍了大脑衰老和不同脑区及组织病理学中的BER变异情况。因此,与其他修复途径相比,本综述将更详细地讨论BER途径。还将讨论其他修复途径,包括直接修复法、核苷酸切除修复(NER)、错配修复(MMR)、同源重组和非同源末端连接。最后,人们越来越关注DNA修复途径在临床领域所起的作用,因为它们与癌症治疗相关的神经毒性和神经病变有关。在癌症治疗的众多副作用中,主要的临床影响包括神经认知功能障碍和周围神经病变。这些症状经常出现,并且尚未在细胞或分子水平上得到有效研究。DNA修复研究可能有助于我们理解那些不进行分裂的细胞如何会因神经毒性而出现以下文章中讨论的临床表现。