Quittet P, Ceballos P, Lopez E, Lu Z Y, Latry P, Becht C, Legouffe E, Fegueux N, Exbrayat C, Pouessel D, Rouillé V, Daures J P, Klein B, Rossi J F
Service Hématologie et Oncologie Médicale, Hopital Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006 Aug;38(4):275-84. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705441.
The use of a combination of G-CSF and GM-CSF versus G-CSF alone, after cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) was compared in two randomized phase III studies, including 120 patients. In study A, 60 patients received 5 x 2 microg/kg/day of G-CSF and GM-CSF compared to 5 mug/kg/day of G-CSF. In study B, 60 patients received 2.5 x 2 microg/kg/day G-CSF and GM-CSF compared to G-CSF alone (5 microg/kg/day). With the aim to collect at least 5 x 10(6)/kg CD34 cells in a maximum of three large volume leukapherises (LK), 123 LK were performed in study A, showing a significantly higher number of patients reaching 10 x 10(6)/kg CD34 cells (21/29 in G+GM-CSF arm vs 11/27 in G-CSF arm, P=0.00006). In study B, 109 LK were performed, with similar results (10/27 vs 15/26, P=0.003). In both the study, the total harvest of CD34 cells/kg was twofold higher in G-CSF plus GM-CSF group (18.3 x 10(6) in study A and 15.85 x 10(6) in study B) than in G-CSF group (9 x 10(6) in study A and 8.1 x 10(6) in study B), a significant difference only seen in multiple myeloma, with no significant difference in terms of mobilized myeloma cells between G-CSF and GM-CSF groups.
在两项随机III期研究中,对120例患者在给予环磷酰胺(4g/m²)后联合使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)和粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)与单独使用G-CSF进行了比较。在研究A中,60例患者接受5×2μg/kg/天的G-CSF和GM-CSF,而另一组60例患者接受5μg/kg/天的G-CSF。在研究B中,60例患者接受2.5×2μg/kg/天的G-CSF和GM-CSF,另一组则单独使用G-CSF(5μg/kg/天)。目标是在最多三次大容量白细胞单采术(LK)中收集至少5×10⁶/kg的CD34细胞,研究A进行了123次LK,结果显示达到10×10⁶/kg CD34细胞的患者数量显著更多(G+GM-CSF组为21/29,G-CSF组为11/27,P=0.00006)。在研究B中,进行了109次LK,结果相似(10/27 vs 15/26,P=0.003)。在两项研究中,G-CSF加GM-CSF组每千克CD34细胞的总收获量比G-CSF组高出两倍(研究A中为18.3×10⁶,研究B中为15.85×10⁶),而G-CSF组在研究A中为9×10⁶,在研究B中为8.1×10⁶,仅在多发性骨髓瘤中存在显著差异,G-CSF组和GM-CSF组之间动员的骨髓瘤细胞数量无显著差异。