Lacey Steven E, Conroy Lorraine M, Forst Linda S, Franke John E, Wadden Richard A, Hedeker Donald R
University of Illinois at Chicago, School of Public Health, Division of Environmental & Occupational Health Sciences, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
J Agromedicine. 2006;11(1):49-58. doi: 10.1300/J096v11n01_06.
A field study was performed to quantify personal dust exposures at a food processing facility. A review of the literature shows very little exposure information in the food processing industry. The processing area consisted of a series of four rooms, connected by a closed-loop ventilation system, housed within a larger warehouse-type facility. Workers were exposed to various fruit and vegetable dusts during the grinding, sieving, mixing and packaging of freeze-dried or air-dried products. Eight two-hour periods were monitored over two days. Personal total suspended particulate samples were collected on 37 mm PVC filters with 5 microm pore size according to National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Method 0500. The filters were analyzed gravimetrically. The two-hour task sampling personal dust exposures ranged from 0.33-103 mg/m3. For each worker, an eight-hour time weighted average (TWA) concentration was calculated, and these ranged from 3.08-59.8 mg/m3. Although there are no directly appropriate occupational exposure limits that may be used for comparison, we selected the Threshold Limit Value (TLV) for particulates not otherwise classified (PNOC) of 10 mg/m3 for inhalable particles. Neglecting the respiratory protection used, five out of eight of the worker time-weighted averages exceeded the TLV. It should be noted that the TLV is based on the inhalable fraction and in this study total suspended particulate was measured; additionally, the TLV is applicable for dusts that are insoluble or poorly soluble, and have low toxicity, which may have limited protective ability in this case due to the irritant nature of certain dusts (e.g., jalapeno peppers, aloe vera). Sieving resulted in significantly higher exposure than grinding and blending. Measuring area concentrations alone in this environment is not a sufficient method of estimating personal exposures due to work practices for some operations.
开展了一项实地研究,以量化一家食品加工厂内的个人粉尘暴露情况。文献综述表明,食品加工行业的暴露信息非常少。加工区域由一系列四个房间组成,通过闭环通风系统相连,位于一个更大的仓库式设施内。在冻干或风干产品的研磨、筛分、混合和包装过程中,工人会接触到各种水果和蔬菜粉尘。在两天内监测了八个两小时时间段。根据美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)方法0500,在孔径为5微米的37毫米PVC滤膜上采集个人总悬浮颗粒物样本。采用重量法对滤膜进行分析。两小时任务采样的个人粉尘暴露范围为0.33 - 103毫克/立方米。为每位工人计算了八小时时间加权平均(TWA)浓度,范围为3.08 - 59.8毫克/立方米。尽管没有可直接用于比较的合适职业暴露限值,但我们选择了可吸入颗粒物的未另作分类的颗粒物(PNOC)的阈限值(TLV)为10毫克/立方米。忽略所使用的呼吸防护措施,八名工人中有五人的时间加权平均值超过了TLV。应当指出的是,TLV是基于可吸入部分,而本研究测量的是总悬浮颗粒物;此外,TLV适用于不溶性或难溶性且毒性低的粉尘,由于某些粉尘(如墨西哥胡椒、芦荟)具有刺激性,在这种情况下其保护能力可能有限。筛分导致的暴露显著高于研磨和混合。由于某些操作的工作方式,仅测量该环境中的区域浓度并不是估计个人暴露的充分方法。