Suppr超能文献

影响自动体外除颤器的召回和安全警报。

Recalls and safety alerts affecting automated external defibrillators.

作者信息

Shah Jignesh S, Maisel William H

机构信息

Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass 02215, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 2006 Aug 9;296(6):655-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.6.655.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) play a key role in the community resuscitation of persons with cardiac arrest and are of proven clinical benefit. Although AEDs are complex medical devices designed to function during life-threatening emergencies, little is known about their reliability.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the number and rate of AED recalls and safety alerts, to identify trends in these rates, and to identify the types of malfunctions prompting AED and AED accessory advisories.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Analysis of weekly US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Enforcement Reports between January 1996 and December 2005 was performed to identify all recalls and safety alerts (collectively referred to as "advisories") involving AEDs and AED accessories. Confirmed AED device malfunctions were identified by reviewing AED-related adverse events reported to the FDA.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Number of AEDs and AED accessories subject to FDA recall or safety alert between January 1996 and December 2005; annual AED advisory rates; and number of confirmed fatal AED-related device malfunctions reported to the FDA.

RESULTS

During 2.78 million AED device-years of observation, 52 advisories (median [25th and 75th percentiles], 4.5 [3.0 and 5.0] per year) affecting 385,922 AEDs and AED accessories were issued. The mean (SE) annual number of AEDs affected by advisories was 5.1 (1.5) devices per 100 AED device-years. Overall, 21.2% of AEDs distributed during the study period were recalled, most often because of electrical or software problems. The AED advisory rate did not significantly increase during the study period, although the annual number of AED advisories (P for trend =.02) and AED advisory devices (P for trend = .01) did increase. Confirmed fatal AED-related device malfunctions occurred in 370 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Automated external defibrillators and AED accessory advisories occur frequently and affect many devices. Actual AED malfunctions do occur occasionally, although the number of observed malfunctions is small compared with the number of lives saved by these important devices. As the prevalence of AEDs continues to increase, the number of devices affected by advisories can also be expected to increase. Efforts should be directed at developing a reliable system to locate and repair potentially defective devices in a timely fashion.

摘要

背景

自动体外除颤器(AED)在心脏骤停患者的社区复苏中发挥着关键作用,且已证实具有临床益处。尽管AED是设计用于在危及生命的紧急情况下发挥作用的复杂医疗设备,但对其可靠性却知之甚少。

目的

确定AED召回和安全警报的数量及发生率,识别这些发生率的趋势,并确定引发AED及AED配件咨询的故障类型。

设计与环境

对1996年1月至2005年12月期间美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的每周执法报告进行分析,以识别所有涉及AED及AED配件的召回和安全警报(统称为“咨询”)。通过审查向FDA报告的与AED相关的不良事件来确定已确认的AED设备故障。

主要观察指标

1996年1月至2005年12月期间接受FDA召回或安全警报的AED及AED配件数量;年度AED咨询率;以及向FDA报告的已确认的与AED相关的致命设备故障数量。

结果

在278万个AED设备观察年期间,共发布了52次咨询(中位数[第25和第75百分位数],每年4.5[3.0和5.0]次),影响了385,922台AED及AED配件。受咨询影响的AED的年均数量(标准误)为每100个AED设备年5.1(1.5)台。总体而言,在研究期间分发的AED中有21.2%被召回,最常见的原因是电气或软件问题。尽管AED咨询的年度数量(趋势P值=0.02)和受AED咨询影响的设备数量(趋势P值=0.01)确实有所增加,但在研究期间AED咨询率并未显著上升。已确认370例患者发生了与AED相关的致命设备故障。

结论

自动体外除颤器及AED配件咨询频繁发生且影响许多设备。实际的AED故障确实偶尔会发生,尽管与这些重要设备挽救的生命数量相比,观察到的故障数量较少。随着AED的普及率持续上升,预计受咨询影响的设备数量也会增加。应致力于开发一个可靠的系统,以便及时定位和修复潜在有缺陷的设备。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验