van Staa T P, Geusens P, Zhang B, Leufkens H G M, Boonen A, Cooper C
Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007 Mar;46(3):460-6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel249. Epub 2006 Aug 9.
There are few data on the cost-effectiveness of bisphosphonates with oral glucocorticoids (GCs). An individual patient-based pharmaco-economic model was developed.
Data were obtained from a cohort of oral GC users aged 40+ (n = 190 000) in the UK General Practice Research Database. Individualized fracture and mortality risks were calculated specific for age, sex, daily and cumulative GC dose, indication and other clinical risk factors. UK costs of medication and direct costs of fracture were obtained from National Institute for Clinical Excellence and used to estimate costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained and fracture prevented for bisphosphonates in patients treated for 5 yrs with GCs.
With the use of 5 mg GCs daily, the cost per one QALY gained with bisphosphonates was 41k UK pounds (95% confidence intervals 22-72k) in women aged <60 [men 40k pounds (29-54k)], 17k pounds (13-24k) in women aged 60-79 [men 43k pounds (31-60k)], 5k pounds(3-6k) in women aged 80+ [men 35k pounds (25-46k)]. With 15 mg GC, these figures were 17k pounds (14-21k), 13k pounds (10-16k) and 15k pounds (9-26k) in women and 22k pounds (17-26k), 34 pounds (23-53k) and 33k pounds (27-42k) in men, respectively. When stratifying by overall fracture risk and life expectancy at the start of GC therapy, cost per QALY increased with decreasing life expectancy. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis had comparatively better cost-effectiveness, given higher fracture risk and better life expectancy.
The cost-effectiveness of bisphosphonates varied substantially. Bisphosphonates can be considered cost-effective in patients with higher fracture risks, such as elderly patients (with a life expectancy over 5 yrs), and younger patients with a fracture history, low body mass index, rheumatoid arthritis or using high GC doses.
关于双膦酸盐与口服糖皮质激素(GCs)联合使用的成本效益的数据较少。因此开发了一个基于个体患者的药物经济学模型。
数据来源于英国全科医学研究数据库中年龄在40岁及以上的口服GC使用者队列(n = 190000)。根据年龄、性别、每日和累积GC剂量、适应症及其他临床风险因素,计算个体骨折和死亡风险。英国药物成本和骨折直接成本来自国家临床优化研究所,并用于估算接受GC治疗5年的患者使用双膦酸盐获得每质量调整生命年(QALY)和预防骨折的成本。
每日使用5mg GCs时,年龄小于60岁的女性使用双膦酸盐获得每QALY的成本为41000英镑(95%置信区间22000 - 72000)[男性为40000英镑(29000 - 54000)],60 - 79岁女性为17000英镑(13000 - 24000)[男性为43000英镑(31000 - 60000)],80岁及以上女性为5000英镑(3000 - 6000)[男性为35000英镑(25000 - 46000)]。每日使用15mg GCs时,女性的这些数字分别为17000英镑(14000 - 21000)、13000英镑(10000 - 16000)和15000英镑(9000 - 26000),男性分别为22000英镑(17000 - 26000)、34000英镑(23000 - 53000)和33000英镑(27000 - 42000)。按GC治疗开始时的总体骨折风险和预期寿命分层时,每QALY成本随预期寿命降低而增加。类风湿关节炎患者由于骨折风险较高且预期寿命较好,成本效益相对较好。
双膦酸盐的成本效益差异很大。双膦酸盐在骨折风险较高的患者中可被认为具有成本效益,如老年患者(预期寿命超过5年)、有骨折史的年轻患者、低体重指数患者、类风湿关节炎患者或使用高剂量GC的患者。