Malcolm Jay R, Liu Canran, Neilson Ronald P, Hansen Lara, Hannah Lee
Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 3B3, Canada.
Conserv Biol. 2006 Apr;20(2):538-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00364.x.
Global warming is a key threat to biodiversity, but few researchers have assessed the magnitude of this threat at the global scale. We used major vegetation types (biomes) as proxies for natural habitats and, based on projected future biome distributions under doubled-CO2 climates, calculated changes in habitat areas and associated extinctions of endemic plant and vertebrate species in biodiversity hotspots. Because of numerous uncertainties in this approach, we undertook a sensitivity analysis of multiple factors that included (1) two global vegetation models, (2) different numbers of biome classes in our biome classification schemes, (3) different assumptions about whether species distributions were biome specific or not, and (4) different migration capabilities. Extinctions were calculated using both species-area and endemic-area relationships. In addition, average required migration rates were calculated for each hotspot assuming a doubled-CO2 climate in 100 years. Projected percent extinctions ranged from <1 to 43% of the endemic biota (average 11.6%), with biome specificity having the greatest influence on the estimates, followed by the global vegetation model and then by migration and biome classification assumptions. Bootstrap comparisons indicated that effects on hotpots as a group were not significantly different from effects on random same-biome collections of grid cells with respect to biome change or migration rates; in some scenarios, however, botspots exhibited relatively high biome change and low migration rates. Especially vulnerable hotspots were the Cape Floristic Region, Caribbean, Indo-Burma, Mediterranean Basin, Southwest Australia, and Tropical Andes, where plant extinctions per hotspot sometimes exceeded 2000 species. Under the assumption that projected habitat changes were attained in 100 years, estimated global-warming-induced rates of species extinctions in tropical hotspots in some cases exceeded those due to deforestation, supporting suggestions that global warming is one of the most serious threats to the planet's biodiversity.
全球变暖是生物多样性面临的关键威胁,但很少有研究人员在全球范围内评估这一威胁的程度。我们将主要植被类型(生物群落)用作自然栖息地的替代指标,并根据二氧化碳浓度翻倍气候下预测的未来生物群落分布,计算生物多样性热点地区栖息地面积的变化以及相关特有植物和脊椎动物物种的灭绝情况。由于这种方法存在诸多不确定性,我们对多个因素进行了敏感性分析,这些因素包括:(1)两种全球植被模型;(2)我们的生物群落分类方案中不同数量的生物群落类别;(3)关于物种分布是否具有生物群落特异性的不同假设;(4)不同的迁移能力。使用物种 - 面积关系和特有区域关系来计算灭绝情况。此外,假设100年后二氧化碳浓度翻倍的气候条件,为每个热点地区计算了平均所需迁移率。预测的特有生物群灭绝百分比范围为<1%至43%(平均11.6%),其中生物群落特异性对估计值的影响最大,其次是全球植被模型,然后是迁移和生物群落分类假设。自助法比较表明,就生物群落变化或迁移率而言,对热点地区作为一个整体的影响与对具有相同生物群落的随机网格单元集合的影响没有显著差异;然而,在某些情况下,热点地区表现出相对较高的生物群落变化和较低的迁移率。特别脆弱的热点地区是开普植物区、加勒比地区、印度 - 缅甸地区、地中海盆地、澳大利亚西南部和热带安第斯山脉,每个热点地区的植物灭绝有时超过2000种。假设预测的栖息地变化在100年内实现,在某些情况下,估计热带热点地区因全球变暖导致的物种灭绝率超过了因森林砍伐导致的灭绝率,这支持了全球变暖是对地球生物多样性最严重威胁之一的观点。