Suppr超能文献

急性冠状动脉综合征后,低风险患者比高风险患者的生活质量更差。

Low risk is associated with poorer quality of life than high risk following acute coronary syndrome.

作者信息

Perers Elisabeth, From Attebring Mona, Caidahl Kenneth, Herlitz Johan, Karlsson Thomas, Wahrborg Peter, Hartford Marianne

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

Coron Artery Dis. 2006 Sep;17(6):501-10. doi: 10.1097/00019501-200609000-00002.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Morbidity after acute coronary syndromes includes both physical and mental disorders affecting quality of life. The aim of this investigation was to study quality of life at a 3-month follow-up in patients with acute coronary syndrome, with the main objective of exploring whether unstable angina pectoris and myocardial infarction (MI) patients differ in this respect.

METHODS

This investigation was part of a prospective risk stratification study of consecutive patients with acute coronary syndrome of whom 814 below the age of 75 years (278 diagnosed with unstable angina pectoris and 536 with myocardial infarction) accepted an invitation to a follow-up visit 3 months after discharge. At follow-up, the patients completed the Cardiac Health Profile, a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire, designed to evaluate perceived cognitive, emotional, social and physical function.

RESULTS

Quality of life was mainly influenced by patient characteristics and previous history. The Cardiac Health Profile scores in unstable angina pectoris patients were significantly higher (i.e. poorer quality of life) than myocardial infarction patients at the 3-month visit (34, 22, 50; median, 25th, 75th percentile and 30, 19, 44; median, 25th, 75th percentile, respectively, P=0.006). The adjusted odds ratio for a poorer quality of life in unstable angina pectoris patients in relation to myocardial infarction patients was 1.39 (95% confidence interval 1.03, 1.87; P=0.03). The highest Cardiac Health Profile scores were seen in the unstable angina pectoris patients without electrocardiogram signs of ongoing ischemia and/or elevated markers of myocardial necrosis.

CONCLUSION

Patients with unstable angina pectoris, especially of the low-risk type, and therefore treated accordingly, are more likely to experience poorer quality of life following an acute hospitalization than patients with other types of acute coronary syndrome. Once myocardial infarction or high-risk unstable angina pectoris has been ruled out, these patients still require a careful and systematic follow-up.

摘要

背景

急性冠脉综合征后的发病率包括影响生活质量的身体和精神障碍。本研究的目的是在急性冠脉综合征患者3个月随访时研究其生活质量,主要目的是探讨不稳定型心绞痛和心肌梗死(MI)患者在这方面是否存在差异。

方法

本研究是一项对连续急性冠脉综合征患者进行前瞻性风险分层研究的一部分,其中814名年龄在75岁以下的患者(278名诊断为不稳定型心绞痛,536名诊断为心肌梗死)在出院后3个月接受了随访邀请。在随访时,患者完成了心脏健康状况问卷,这是一份针对特定疾病的生活质量问卷,旨在评估感知到的认知、情感、社会和身体功能。

结果

生活质量主要受患者特征和既往病史的影响。在3个月随访时,不稳定型心绞痛患者的心脏健康状况问卷得分显著高于心肌梗死患者(即生活质量较差)(分别为34、22、50;中位数、第25百分位数、第75百分位数和30、19、44;中位数、第25百分位数、第75百分位数,P = 0.006)。不稳定型心绞痛患者与心肌梗死患者相比,生活质量较差的调整后优势比为1.39(95%置信区间1.03,1.87;P = 0.03)。心脏健康状况问卷得分最高的是没有心电图显示持续缺血和/或心肌坏死标志物升高的不稳定型心绞痛患者。

结论

不稳定型心绞痛患者,尤其是低风险类型患者,因此接受相应治疗,与其他类型急性冠脉综合征患者相比,急性住院后更有可能经历较差的生活质量。一旦排除心肌梗死或高危不稳定型心绞痛,这些患者仍需要仔细和系统的随访。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验