Walley Paul, Silvester Kate, Steyn Richard
University of Warwick, UK.
Healthc Pap. 2006;7(1):26-33; discussion 74-7. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2006.18312.
Wait limits have improved UK healthcare access, and Ontario's Wait Time Strategy bears a remarkable resemblance. There appears to be an implicit assumption that capacity and efficiency factors are the main causes of waits. The improvement mechanism is driven by performance measurement that reports wait time outcomes. Our experience makes us conclude that Ontario's plans contain risks. Superficially, the UK approach has been successful with dramatic wait time reductions but has incurred tremendous financial cost and patients not always benefiting. Reasons for partial success are not understanding the cause of waiting, with inappropriate"improvements"; and often encouraging unintended behaviours, with poor stakeholder management. Those sustaining their approach have significantly better performance and timely service without excess cost, but their approach has not seen a wide enough audience for acceptance and adoption. At the top, there is almost bewilderment about why others struggle with wait time targets. For an effective program it is essential to understand the system and have consistency between the measurement system and engendered behaviour, the root causes of waits and solutions, the management style and improvement culture, the reward system and good clinical practice.
等待时限改善了英国的医疗服务可及性,安大略省的等待时间策略与之极为相似。似乎有一种隐含的假设,即能力和效率因素是等待的主要原因。改善机制由报告等待时间结果的绩效衡量驱动。我们的经验使我们得出结论,安大略省的计划存在风险。从表面上看,英国的方法在大幅减少等待时间方面取得了成功,但却产生了巨大的财务成本,而且患者并非总能从中受益。部分成功的原因在于没有理解等待的原因,进行了不恰当的“改进”;并且常常由于利益相关者管理不善而鼓励了意外行为。那些坚持其方法的机构在没有额外成本的情况下具有显著更好的绩效和及时的服务,但他们的方法尚未得到足够广泛的认可和采用。在高层,几乎对其他人为何在等待时间目标上苦苦挣扎感到困惑。对于一个有效的项目来说,了解系统、使衡量系统与所引发的行为保持一致、等待的根本原因和解决方案、管理风格和改进文化、奖励系统以及良好的临床实践至关重要。