van Oeveren W, Harder M P, Roozendaal K J, Eijsman L, Wildevuur C R
Department of Cardiopulmonary Surgery, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990 May;99(5):788-96; discussion 796-7.
Remarkable improvement in hemostasis after cardiopulmonary bypass has been achieved by treatment with the proteinase inhibitor aprotinin, but the mechanism is still unclear. The present study is designed to elucidate the importance of platelet adhesive (glycoprotein Ib) or aggregatory (glycoprotein IIbIIIa) receptors on this hemostatic function in cardiopulmonary bypass and its improvement by aprotinin treatment. To determine whether the first pass of blood through the circuit or a continuous proteolytic attack is the main cause of platelet damage, we gave two different dose regimens of aprotinin treatment to patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Part I of the study consisted of a double-blind trial on 60 patients. Patients received placebo or aprotinin infusion (total 6.10(6) KIU) before and during bypass. A consecutive group of 22 matching patients received one single bolus of aprotinin in the pump prime (2.10(6) KIU). Blood samples were collected before and during operation to assess the effect of bypass and aprotinin on platelets and the activation of the various proteases in relation to hemostasis expressed in blood loss and blood requirements. The adhesive platelet membrane Ib glycoproteins were decreased by 50% in the untreated patients within 5 minutes of cardiopulmonary bypass and remained low during bypass, whereas glycoprotein Ib did not decrease in either group of aprotinin-treated patients. The platelet membrane IIbIIIa glycoproteins did not significantly change during bypass in either group, but fibrinogen binding to these receptors improved significantly in the 6.10(6) KIU aprotinin-treated group at the end of bypass as compared with initial values. The high continuous dose of 6.10(6) KIU aprotinin inhibited the clotting and kallikrein/kinin system throughout the operation; the pump prime dose of 2.10(6) KIU inhibited these systems only initially. Although the fibrinolytic activity was effectively inhibited in both aprotinin groups, fibrinolytic activity became apparent only at the end phase of bypass in the placebo group. However, improved hemostasis was observed intraoperatively from the start of bypass and resulted in a 40% lower blood loss intraoperatively and postoperatively and consequently a 40% lower total blood requirement in the aprotinin-treated patients than in the untreated patients. Our results therefore demonstrate that the improved hemostasis during and after bypass in patients treated with aprotinin has specifically to be attributed to a preserved adhesive capacity of platelets that was affected in the first pass of blood through the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit.
通过使用蛋白酶抑制剂抑肽酶治疗,体外循环后的止血情况有了显著改善,但其机制仍不清楚。本研究旨在阐明血小板黏附(糖蛋白Ib)或聚集(糖蛋白IIbIIIa)受体在体外循环止血功能中的重要性,以及抑肽酶治疗对其的改善作用。为了确定血液首次通过体外循环回路还是持续的蛋白水解攻击是血小板损伤的主要原因,我们对接受冠状动脉搭桥手术的患者给予了两种不同剂量方案的抑肽酶治疗。研究的第一部分包括对60名患者的双盲试验。患者在体外循环前和期间接受安慰剂或抑肽酶输注(总量6.10(6) KIU)。连续一组22名匹配患者在泵预充液中接受一次大剂量抑肽酶(2.10(6) KIU)。在手术前和手术期间采集血样,以评估体外循环和抑肽酶对血小板的影响,以及与失血和用血需求所表达的止血相关的各种蛋白酶的激活情况。在未治疗的患者中,体外循环5分钟内黏附性血小板膜Ib糖蛋白减少50%,且在体外循环期间一直保持较低水平,而在两组接受抑肽酶治疗的患者中,糖蛋白Ib均未减少。两组患者在体外循环期间血小板膜IIbIIIa糖蛋白均无显著变化,但与初始值相比,在体外循环结束时,6.10(6) KIU抑肽酶治疗组中纤维蛋白原与这些受体的结合显著改善。高持续剂量6.10(6) KIU抑肽酶在整个手术过程中抑制凝血和激肽释放酶/激肽系统;泵预充剂量2.10(6) KIU仅在最初抑制这些系统。虽然在两组抑肽酶治疗组中纤溶活性均得到有效抑制,但纤溶活性仅在安慰剂组体外循环末期才明显显现。然而,在体外循环开始时就观察到术中止血情况得到改善,与未治疗的患者相比,接受抑肽酶治疗的患者术中及术后失血量减少40%,因此总用血需求降低40%。因此,我们的结果表明,接受抑肽酶治疗的患者在体外循环期间及之后止血情况的改善特别归因于血小板黏附能力的保留,而血小板黏附能力在血液首次通过体外循环回路时受到影响。