Bouza Emilio, Muñoz Patricia, Alcalá Luis, Pérez María Jesús, Rincón Cristina, Barrio José María, Pinto Angel
Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense, 28007 Madrid, Spain.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006 Dec;56(4):345-9. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.06.012. Epub 2006 Aug 23.
The aim of the study was to assess of the role of intraoperative cultures taken at the end of major heart surgery (MHS) in the prediction of postoperative mediastinitis (PM) in patients undergoing MHS over a 6-month period in a tertiary university hospital. Just before wound closure, a sample of the sternal border was taken, swabbing back and forth the sternal border and the subcutaneous tissues. A second sample was taken after irrigation of the deep mediastinal structures with 10 mL of Ringer lactate. Swabs were processed semiquantitatively and the mediastinal fluid with a quantitative technique. The observation of one or more colonies per plate was considered a positive culture. Cultures obtained at the end of 229 surgical interventions (227 patients) were positive with the semiquantitative or with the quantitative procedures in 31.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.1-37.4%) and 34.5% (95% CI, 28.4-41.0%) of the times, respectively (P = NS). The number of microorganisms isolated in the wound swab or mediastinal fluid was 91 and 110, respectively. Of the 227 patients, 7 developed an episode of PM (3.1%; 95% CI, 1.2-6.2%) after a median time of 11 days (range, 5-19 days). The microorganisms causing the 7 cases of mediastinitis were not isolated in the intraoperative cultures in any of the cases. The value of intraoperative cultures as a test for prediction of PM depending on the breakpoint chosen were as follows: sensitivity (0%), specificity (66.2-97.3%), and positive (0%) and negative predictive values (96.8-98.0%). We recommend against surveillance cultures taken intraoperatively in patients undergoing MHS.
本研究的目的是评估在一所三级大学医院中,接受心脏大手术(MHS)的患者在6个月期间,心脏大手术结束时进行的术中培养在预测术后纵隔炎(PM)方面的作用。在伤口闭合前,采集胸骨边缘样本,在胸骨边缘和皮下组织上来回擦拭。在用10 mL乳酸林格液冲洗深部纵隔结构后,采集第二个样本。拭子采用半定量方法处理,纵隔液采用定量技术处理。每平板观察到一个或多个菌落被视为培养阳性。在229例手术干预(227例患者)结束时获得的培养物,半定量或定量程序的阳性率分别为31.0%(95%置信区间[CI],25.1 - 37.4%)和34.5%(95%CI,28.4 - 41.0%)(P = 无显著性差异)。伤口拭子或纵隔液中分离出的微生物数量分别为91和110。在227例患者中,7例发生了PM(3.1%;95%CI,1.2 - 6.2%),中位时间为11天(范围,5 - 19天)。导致7例纵隔炎的微生物在任何病例的术中培养中均未分离出来。根据选定的分界点,术中培养作为预测PM的检测方法的价值如下:敏感性(0%)、特异性(66.2 - 97.3%)、阳性预测值(0%)和阴性预测值(96.8 - 98.0%)。我们建议不应对接受心脏大手术的患者进行术中监测培养。