Jones Ronald N, Sader Helio S, Fritsche Thomas R, Pottumarthy Sudha
JMI Laboratories, 345 Beaver Kreek Centre, North Liberty, IA 52317, USA.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Jan;57(1):109-16. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.06.011. Epub 2006 Aug 23.
A contemporary collection of 12737 strains from pediatric patients (<18 years) isolated over a 7-year period (1998-2004) from 52 sentinel hospitals in North America was tested to determine the comparative antimicrobial potency of broad-spectrum parenteral cephalosporins and selected comparator agents. Most of the strains (84.1%) were isolated from blood stream or respiratory tract infections. The rank order of the top 10 pediatric pathogens analyzed was Streptococcus pneumoniae (15.5%) >Haemophilus influenzae (14.6%) >Staphylococcus aureus (13.8%) >Moraxella catarrhalis = coagulase-negative staphylococci (8.0%) >Escherichia coli (7.8%) >Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5.2%) >Klebsiella spp. (4.8%) >Enterococcus spp. (4.7%) > beta-hemolytic streptococci (4.4%). Both cefepime and ceftriaxone (MIC(90), 1 microg/mL; 93.9% and 93.7% susceptible, respectively) were highly active against S. pneumoniae. However, the S. pneumoniae strains showed reduced susceptibility to ceftazidime (56.6%), as well as penicillin (56.6%) < trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (57.1%) < erythromycin (66.2%) < tetracycline (71.4%). beta-Hemolytic streptococci showed 100.0% susceptibility to penicillin, cefepime, and ceftriaxone. Cefepime and ceftriaxone exhibited high activity against oxacillin (methicillin)-susceptible S. aureus, (MIC(90), 4 microg/mL; 100.0% and 99.8% susceptible, respectively), whereas ceftazidime (MIC(90), 16 microg/mL) was active against only 86.7% of strains. H. influenzae strains showed complete susceptibility to cefepime, ceftriaxone, and levofloxacin (MIC(90), < or =0.5 microg/mL; 100.0%), and 34.0% of H. influenzae and 99.2% of M. catarrhalis strains produced beta-lactamase. Although the 3 cephalosporins tested (cefepime, ceftriaxone, and ceftazidime) were very active (98.6-99.6% susceptible) against E. coli, cefepime (99.0% susceptible) was slightly more active than ceftriaxone and ceftazidime (96.4% and 95.1% susceptible, respectively) against Klebsiella spp. Cefepime was also the most active beta-lactam agent tested against Enterobacter spp. (MIC(90), 2 microg/mL; 99.3% susceptible), whereas the susceptibility rates of other broad-spectrum beta-lactams (ceftriaxone, ceftazidime and piperacillin-tazobactam) were significantly lower (78.4-81.5%). Against P. aeruginosa, imipenem and piperacillin-tazobactam showed the highest susceptibility rates (94.4% and 93.3%, respectively), whereas imipenem and cefepime showed the lowest resistance rates (1.4% and 2.3%, respectively). Our results indicate that cefepime was the most broad-spectrum cephalosporin analyzed and remains a very potent alternative for the treatment of contemporary pediatric infections in North America.
对1998年至2004年7年间从北美52家哨点医院分离出的12737株儿科患者(<18岁)的当代菌株进行检测,以确定广谱肠外头孢菌素和选定对照药物的比较抗菌效力。大多数菌株(84.1%)分离自血流或呼吸道感染。分析的前10种儿科病原体的排序为肺炎链球菌(15.5%)>流感嗜血杆菌(14.6%)>金黄色葡萄球菌(13.8%)>卡他莫拉菌=凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(8.0%)>大肠埃希菌(7.8%)>铜绿假单胞菌(5.2%)>克雷伯菌属(4.8%)>肠球菌属(4.7%)>β溶血性链球菌(4.4%)。头孢吡肟和头孢曲松(MIC90,1μg/mL;分别为93.9%和93.7%敏感)对肺炎链球菌均具有高活性。然而,肺炎链球菌菌株对头孢他啶(56.6%)以及青霉素(56.6%)<甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(57.1%)<红霉素(66.2%)<四环素(71.4%)的敏感性降低。β溶血性链球菌对青霉素、头孢吡肟和头孢曲松的敏感性为100.0%。头孢吡肟和头孢曲松对苯唑西林(甲氧西林)敏感金黄色葡萄球菌具有高活性(MIC90,4μg/mL;分别为100.0%和99.8%敏感),而头孢他啶(MIC90,16μg/mL)仅对86.7%的菌株有活性。流感嗜血杆菌菌株对头孢吡肟、头孢曲松和左氧氟沙星完全敏感(MIC90,≤0.5μg/mL;100.0%),34.0%的流感嗜血杆菌和99.2%的卡他莫拉菌菌株产生β-内酰胺酶。尽管所检测的3种头孢菌素(头孢吡肟、头孢曲松和头孢他啶)对大肠埃希菌非常有活性(98.6 - 99.6%敏感),但头孢吡肟(99.0%敏感)对克雷伯菌属的活性略高于头孢曲松和头孢他啶(分别为96.4%和95.1%敏感)。头孢吡肟也是所检测的对肠杆菌属最有活性的β-内酰胺类药物(MIC90,2μg/mL;99.3%敏感);而其他广谱β-内酰胺类药物(头孢曲松、头孢他啶和哌拉西林-他唑巴坦)的敏感率显著较低(78.4 - 81.5%)。对铜绿假单胞菌而言,亚胺培南和哌拉西林-他唑巴坦的敏感率最高(分别为94.4%和93.3%),而亚胺培南和头孢吡肟的耐药率最低(分别为1.4%和2.3%)。我们的结果表明,头孢吡肟是所分析的最广谱的头孢菌素,并且仍然是治疗北美当代儿科感染的一种非常有效的替代药物。