Sage William M
University of Texas School of Law, 727 East Dean Keeton Street, Austin, TX 78705, USA.
Acad Med. 2006 Sep;81(9):823-6. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200609000-00011.
The political battle over trial lawyers and "tort reform" centers on whether or not to reduce incentives to sue for medical malpractice by capping damages in malpractice suits and limiting legal fees. But the current struggle mis-states the case for innovation in medical malpractice policy. Rather than focus exclusively on the financial consequences of legal claims, malpractice reform should move closer to the bedside, emphasizing error prevention, open communication, rapid compensation, and efficient insurance of the costs of injury. Academic health centers are well positioned to lead this effort in each of their three recognized missions: patient care, teaching, and research. Academic health centers enjoy greater institutional cohesiveness and research capacity than most other medical practice settings. Perhaps most important, their high visibility ensures that patients who suffer avoidable harm within their walls become salient to the public as individuals, not merely as dollar entries in a litigation ledger.
围绕审判律师和“侵权法改革”的政治斗争聚焦于是否通过限制医疗事故诉讼中的损害赔偿和律师费来减少医疗事故诉讼的诱因。但当前的斗争错误地阐述了医疗事故政策创新的理由。医疗事故改革不应只专注于法律索赔的财务后果,而应更贴近病床边,强调错误预防、开放沟通、快速赔偿以及对伤害成本的有效保险。学术医疗中心在其公认的三项使命(患者护理、教学和研究)中的每一项上都具备引领这项工作的良好条件。学术医疗中心比大多数其他医疗实践机构享有更高的机构凝聚力和研究能力。也许最重要的是,它们的高知名度确保了在其机构内遭受可避免伤害的患者作为个体而非仅仅作为诉讼账本上的金额条目而为公众所关注。