Mohammedamin Robbert S A, van der Wouden Johannes C, Koning Sander, Willemsen Sten P, Bernsen Roos M D, Schellevis François G, van Suijlekom-Smit Lisette W A, Koes Bart W
Department of General Practice, Room FF 304, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Fam Pract. 2006 Aug 31;7:52. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-52.
Sepsis or bacteraemia, however rare, is a significant cause of high mortality and serious complications in children. In previous studies skin disease or skin infections were reported as risk factor. We hypothesize that children with sepsis or bacteraemia more often presented with skin diseases to the general practitioner (GP) than other children. If our hypothesis is true the GP could reduce the risk of sepsis or bacteraemia by managing skin diseases appropriately.
We performed a case-control study using data of children aged 0-17 years of the second Dutch national survey of general practice (2001) and the National Medical Registration of all hospital admissions in the Netherlands. Cases were defined as children who were hospitalized for sepsis or bacteraemia. We selected two control groups by matching each case with six controls. The first control group was randomly selected from the GP patient lists irrespective of hospital admission and GP consultation. The second control group was randomly sampled from those children who were hospitalized for other reasons than sepsis or bacteraemia. We calculated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI). A two-sided p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant in all tests.
We found odds ratios for skin related GP consultations of 3.4 (95% CI: [1.1-10.8], p = 0.03) in cases versus GP controls and 1.4 (95% CI: [0.5-3.9], p = 0.44) in cases versus hospital controls. Children younger than three months had an odds ratio (cases/GP controls) of 9.2 (95% CI: [0.81-106.1], p = 0.07) and 4.0 (95% CI: [0.67-23.9], p = 0.12) among cases versus hospital controls. Although cases consulted the GP more often with skin diseases than their controls, the probability of a GP consultation for skin disease was only 5% among cases.
There is evidence that children who were admitted due to sepsis or bacteraemia consulted the GP more often for skin diseases than other children, but the differences are not clinically relevant indicating that there is little opportunity for GPs to reduce the risk of sepsis and/or bacteraemia considerably by managing skin diseases appropriately.
脓毒症或菌血症虽罕见,但却是儿童高死亡率及严重并发症的重要病因。既往研究报道皮肤病或皮肤感染为风险因素。我们推测,与其他儿童相比,因脓毒症或菌血症就诊于全科医生(GP)的儿童皮肤病发病率更高。若我们的假设成立,全科医生可通过适当处理皮肤病来降低脓毒症或菌血症风险。
我们利用荷兰第二次全国全科医疗调查(2001年)中0至17岁儿童的数据以及荷兰所有住院患者的国家医疗登记数据进行了一项病例对照研究。病例定义为因脓毒症或菌血症住院的儿童。我们通过为每个病例匹配六个对照选取了两个对照组。第一个对照组从全科医生的患者名单中随机选取,不考虑是否住院及是否咨询过全科医生。第二个对照组从因脓毒症或菌血症以外的其他原因住院的儿童中随机抽样。我们计算了比值比及95%置信区间(CI)。所有检验中,双侧p值小于0.05被视为具有统计学意义。
我们发现,病例组与全科医生对照组相比,因皮肤问题咨询全科医生的比值比为3.4(95%CI:[1.1 - 10.8],p = 0.03),病例组与医院对照组相比为1.4(95%CI:[0.5 - 3.9],p = 0.44)。三个月以下的儿童,病例组与全科医生对照组的比值比为9.2(95%CI:[0.81 - 106.1],p = 0.07),病例组与医院对照组相比为4.0(95%CI:[0.67 - 23.9],p = 0.12)。尽管病例组因皮肤病咨询全科医生的频率高于对照组,但病例组因皮肤病咨询全科医生的概率仅为5%。
有证据表明,因脓毒症或菌血症入院儿童因皮肤病咨询全科医生的频率高于其他儿童,但这些差异在临床上并无关联,这表明全科医生通过适当处理皮肤病大幅降低脓毒症和/或菌血症风险的机会很小。