Moreland Natalie C, Ujiki Michael, Matsumura Jon S, Morasch Mark D, Eskandari Mark K, Pearce William H, Kibbe Melina R
Division of Vascular Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Sep;44(3):595-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.05.046.
Compression of the left common iliac vein (LCIV) by the right common iliac artery is an anatomic variant that may increase the risk for LCIV thrombosis. The incidence of LCIV compression in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is unknown, however. The aim of this descriptive anatomic study was to determine (1) the incidence of LCIV compression in patients with and without AAA and (2) if endovascular AAA repair acutely alters the incidence of LCIV compression and, hence, the risk of LCIV thrombosis.
A retrospective analysis of medical records and helical computed tomography (CT) scans was conducted in 100 AAA patients and 100 non-AAA patients (n = 200). Medical records were reviewed for symptoms and risk factors for deep vein thrombosis, and data were reported according to the Joint Society Reporting Standards for acute lower-extremity venous thrombosis. The minor diameters of the aorta, inferior vena cava, and common iliac arteries and veins were measured. For AAA patients, measurements were obtained from preoperative and 30-day postoperative CT scans.
The mean age of the study cohort was 38 years (range, 17 to 85 years) for non-AAA subjects and 73 years (range, 51 to 89 years) for AAA subjects. The mean acute lower-extremity venous thrombosis risk factor score was low for both patient groups (non-AAA, 0.82 +/- 0.12; AAA, 2.63 +/- 0.14). Mean compression of the LCIV was 37.8% (range, 0% to 74.8%) for non-AAA patients but only 27.3% (range, 0% to 74.2%; P < .0006) for AAA patients. Of non-AAA patients with venous compression, the right common iliac artery was the compressing structure in 87% of cases. However, of AAA patients with venous compression, the left common iliac artery was the compressing structure in 76% of cases. There was no statistically significant change in the degree of compression of the LCIV before and after endovascular repair (27.3% vs 25.1%, respectively) nor was there a change in the structure that compressed the LCIV.
Patients with AAA were found to have more tortuous iliac arteries that led to less anatomic compression of the LCIV compared with nonaneurysmal patients. Furthermore, the left common iliac artery was found to compress the LCIV in most of the AAA patients, and the right iliac artery was found to compress the LCIV in most non-AAA patients. Endovascular AAA repair did not acutely alter these anatomic findings. Patients with AAA may therefore be at lower risk of developing LCIV thrombosis owing to the nature of their anatomy.
左髂总静脉(LCIV)受右髂总动脉压迫是一种解剖变异,可能增加LCIV血栓形成风险。然而,腹主动脉瘤(AAA)患者中LCIV受压的发生率尚不清楚。本描述性解剖学研究的目的是确定:(1)有和没有AAA的患者中LCIV受压的发生率;(2)血管腔内AAA修复术是否会急性改变LCIV受压的发生率,进而改变LCIV血栓形成的风险。
对100例AAA患者和100例非AAA患者(n = 200)的病历和螺旋计算机断层扫描(CT)进行回顾性分析。查阅病历以了解深静脉血栓形成的症状和危险因素,并根据急性下肢静脉血栓形成的联合学会报告标准报告数据。测量主动脉、下腔静脉以及髂总动静脉的最小直径。对于AAA患者,从术前和术后30天的CT扫描中获取测量数据。
非AAA受试者研究队列的平均年龄为38岁(范围17至85岁),AAA受试者为73岁(范围51至89岁)。两组患者的平均急性下肢静脉血栓形成危险因素评分均较低(非AAA组,0.82±0.12;AAA组,2.63±0.14)。非AAA患者中LCIV的平均受压率为37.8%(范围0%至74.8%),而AAA患者仅为27.3%(范围0%至74.2%;P <.0006)。在有静脉受压的非AAA患者中,87%的病例右髂总动脉为压迫结构。然而,在有静脉受压的AAA患者中,76%的病例左髂总动脉为压迫结构。血管腔内修复前后LCIV的受压程度无统计学显著变化(分别为27.3%和25.1%),压迫LCIV的结构也无变化。
与非动脉瘤患者相比,发现AAA患者的髂动脉更迂曲,导致LCIV的解剖性受压较少。此外,发现大多数AAA患者中左髂总动脉压迫LCIV,而大多数非AAA患者中右髂总动脉压迫LCIV。血管腔内AAA修复术并未急性改变这些解剖学发现。因此,由于其解剖结构的性质,AAA患者发生LCIV血栓形成的风险可能较低。