Libertini Giacinto
Independent Researcher, via Cavour 13, Caivano 80023, Naples, Italy.
ScientificWorldJournal. 2006 Aug 31;6:1086-108. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2006.209.
A large set of data suggests that progressive reduction of fitness and senile decay in vertebrates are in correlation with the decline of cell replication capacities. However, the limits in such capacities are hardly explained in evolutionarily terms by current gerontological theories that rule out fitness decline as something genetically determined and regulated, and therefore somehow favored by natural selection. Four theories are tested as possible explanations of the "increasing mortality with increasing chronological age in populations in the wild" ("IMICAW"[1]), alias "actuarial senescence in the wild"[2], and of the observed negative correlation between extrinsic mortality and the ratio between deaths due to intrinsic mortality and deaths due to extrinsic mortality. Only the theory attributing an adaptive value to IMICAW allows an evolutionary explanation for it and for the aforesaid inverse correlation, while the other three theories ("mutation accumulation", "antagonistic pleiotropy", and "disposable soma" th.) even predict a positive correlation. Afterwards, the same theories are tested as possible explanations for the "state of senility"[3], namely the deteriorated state of individuals in artificially protected conditions (captivity, civilization, etc.) at ages rarely or never observable in the wild. With the distinction between "damage resulting from intrinsic living processes"[4], alias "age changes"[5], and "age-associated diseases"[4,5], the same theory explaining IMICAW allows a rational interpretation of the first category of phenomena while another theory, the "mutation accumulation" hypothesis, gives an immediate interpretation for the second category. The current gerontological paradigm explaining the increasing mortality with increasing chronological age as consequence of insufficient selection should be restricted to the "age-associated diseases". For IMICAW, it should be substituted with the concept of a physiologic phenomenon genetically determined by a balance of opposite selective pressures--strictly in terms of kin selection--and, for "age changes", with the action of the same IMICAW-causing mechanisms at ages when selection becomes ineffective.
大量数据表明,脊椎动物体能的逐渐衰退和衰老与细胞复制能力的下降相关。然而,目前的老年学理论难以从进化角度解释这种能力的限制,这些理论排除了体能下降是由基因决定和调控的,因此在某种程度上受到自然选择青睐的观点。对四种理论进行了检验,以探寻其是否能解释“野生种群中随年龄增长死亡率增加”(“IMICAW”[1],又名“野生环境中的精算衰老”[2])以及所观察到的外在死亡率与内在死亡率导致的死亡和外在死亡率导致的死亡之间的比率的负相关关系。只有将适应性价值归因于IMICAW的理论能够对其及上述负相关关系给出进化解释,而其他三种理论(“突变积累”、“拮抗多效性”和“可抛弃体细胞”理论)甚至预测会出现正相关。之后,对这些理论进行检验,看其是否能解释“衰老状态”[3],即在人工保护条件(圈养、文明环境等)下个体的退化状态,这种状态在野生环境中很少或从未被观察到。区分“内在生命过程导致的损伤”[4],又名“年龄变化”[5],和“与年龄相关的疾病”[4,5]后发现,解释IMICAW的同一理论能够对第一类现象给出合理的解释,而另一种理论,即“突变积累”假说,则能直接解释第二类现象。目前将随年龄增长死亡率增加解释为选择不足结果的老年学范式应仅限于“与年龄相关的疾病”。对于IMICAW,应代之以由相反选择压力平衡(严格从亲缘选择角度)基因决定的生理现象的概念,对于“年龄变化”,应代之以在选择失效的年龄由导致IMICAW的相同机制起作用的解释。