Wolfart Mona, Wolfart Stefan, Kern Matthias
Department of Prosthodontics, Propaedeutics and Dental Materials, Dental School, Christian-Albrechts-University at Kiel, Germany.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 Jul-Aug;21(4):519-25.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of cement type and application technique on seating discrepancies and retention forces of noble alloy castings cemented on titanium abutments.
Eugenol-free zinc oxide (Freegenol), zinc phosphate (Harvard), glass ionomer (KetacCem), polycarboxylate (Durelon), and self-adhesive resin (RelyX Unicem) cements were used. The inner surfaces of the castings were either completely coated or half-coated with cement. Abutments were used as delivered with a machined surface for the first part of the study. Groups of 8 castings were cemented in both ways. For the second part of the study, the abutments were air-abraded (aluminum oxide, 50 microm particle size), and groups of 8 completely coated castings were cemented with all cements. Marginal discrepancies were measured before and immediately after cementation. Tensile tests were conducted to measure the retention forces. Statistical analysis was performed with pair-wise comparison using the Wilcoxon rank sum test modified by Bonferroni-Holm.
Change in seating discrepancies did not differ significantly among the different application techniques. The median retention forces for completely-coated castings were 177 N for eugenol-free zinc oxide, 346 N for zinc phosphate, 469 N for glass ionomer, 813 N for polycarboxylate, and 653 N for self-adhesive resin. With respect to retention force, 3 significantly different groups (P < .05) were identified: (1) zinc oxide, (2) zinc phosphate/glass ionomer, and (3) polycarboxylate/self-adhesive resin. No differences in retention between the 2 coating techniques were found for any cement. However, air abrading the abutments resulted in increased retention of the castings for some of the cements.
Half-coating of the restorations with cements did not result in reduced retention values compared to the complete coating technique, but air abrasion resulted in increased retention with some cements.
本体外研究的目的是评估粘结剂类型和应用技术对粘结在钛基台上的贵金属合金铸件就位差异和固位力的影响。
使用不含丁香酚的氧化锌(Freegenol)、磷酸锌(Harvard)、玻璃离子水门汀(KetacCem)、聚羧酸锌水门汀(Durelon)和自粘结树脂水门汀(RelyX Unicem)。铸件的内表面要么完全涂覆粘结剂,要么半涂覆粘结剂。在研究的第一部分,使用具有加工表面的基台。8个铸件为一组,以两种方式进行粘结。在研究的第二部分,对基台进行空气喷砂处理(氧化铝,粒径50微米),8个完全涂覆粘结剂的铸件为一组,用所有粘结剂进行粘结。在粘结前和粘结后立即测量边缘差异。进行拉伸试验以测量固位力。采用经Bonferroni-Holm修正的Wilcoxon秩和检验进行成对比较的统计分析。
不同应用技术之间就位差异的变化没有显著差异。完全涂覆粘结剂的铸件的中位固位力分别为:不含丁香酚的氧化锌粘结剂为177 N,磷酸锌粘结剂为346 N,玻璃离子水门汀为469 N,聚羧酸锌水门汀为813 N,自粘结树脂水门汀为653 N。关于固位力,确定了3个有显著差异的组(P <.05):(1)氧化锌粘结剂,(2)磷酸锌/玻璃离子水门汀,(3)聚羧酸锌/自粘结树脂水门汀。对于任何粘结剂,两种涂覆技术之间的固位力没有差异。然而,对基台进行空气喷砂处理导致一些粘结剂粘结的铸件固位力增加。
与完全涂覆技术相比,修复体半涂覆粘结剂不会导致固位值降低,但空气喷砂处理会使一些粘结剂的固位力增加。