Suppr超能文献

一项关于抑郁症患者在接受电休克治疗与药物治疗联合治疗或仅接受药物治疗后所报告的记忆问题的回顾性对照研究。

A retrospective controlled study into memory complaints reported by depressed patients after treatment with electroconvulsive therapy and pharmacotherapy or pharmacotherapy only.

作者信息

Kho King Han, VanVreeswijk Michiel Floris, Murre Jaap M J

机构信息

GGZ Delfland St Jorisweg 2, 2612 GA Delft, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J ECT. 2006 Sep;22(3):199-205. doi: 10.1097/01.yct.0000235926.37494.f7.

Abstract

Few studies have been conducted comparing complaints of memory problems using objective and subjective memory scales in depressed patients who received electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) + pharmacotherapy or treatment with pharmacotherapy only. Patients who suffer from depression according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder (Fourth Edition) criteria and who were admitted within the past 5 years before this study in a general psychiatric hospital were screened for inclusion. Objective retrograde amnesia was assessed using the Autobiographical Memory Interview and the Amsterdam Media Questionnaire (AMQ). Subjective retrograde amnesia was assessed using the Squire Subjective Memory Questionnaire and the ECT Retrograde Amnesia and Perception Scale (ERAPS), a newly developed scale. Twenty of the 84 patients who received ECT + pharmacotherapy and 30 of the 196 patients who received pharmacotherapy only participated in the study. Patients' ERAPS memory scores were compared with proxies' ERAPS memory scores of the patients to assess the reliability of memory complaints. The ECT + pharmacotherapy group was found to suffer more from memory problems using the AMQ 1990 test. There was also a difference for the proxy's ERAPS memory score, reflecting the conviction of proxies from the ECT + pharmacotherapy patients that these patients suffer more memory problems due to the illness, treatment with pharmacotherapy, or ECT. The differences could not be explained by the influence of determinants for retrograde amnesia. ECT + pharmacotherapy patients did not attribute their memory problems mainly to ECT but put equal "blame" on the depressive illness, treatment with pharmacotherapy, and ECT. The analyses suggest that the AMQ 1990s test is (more) sensitive in registering retrograde amnesia than the other scales used in the study.

摘要

很少有研究比较接受电休克治疗(ECT)联合药物治疗或仅接受药物治疗的抑郁症患者使用客观和主观记忆量表时的记忆问题主诉。根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第四版)标准患有抑郁症且在本研究前5年内入住一家普通精神病医院的患者被筛选纳入研究。使用自传体记忆访谈和阿姆斯特丹媒体问卷(AMQ)评估客观逆行性遗忘。使用斯夸尔主观记忆问卷和一种新开发的量表ECT逆行性遗忘与感知量表(ERAPS)评估主观逆行性遗忘。接受ECT联合药物治疗的84名患者中有20名,仅接受药物治疗的196名患者中有30名参与了研究。将患者的ERAPS记忆评分与患者代理人的ERAPS记忆评分进行比较,以评估记忆问题主诉的可靠性。使用AMQ 1990测试发现ECT联合药物治疗组记忆问题更严重。代理人的ERAPS记忆评分也存在差异,这反映了ECT联合药物治疗患者的代理人认为这些患者因疾病、药物治疗或ECT而存在更多记忆问题。这些差异无法用逆行性遗忘的决定因素的影响来解释。ECT联合药物治疗的患者并非主要将其记忆问题归因于ECT,而是将同等的“责任”归咎于抑郁症、药物治疗和ECT。分析表明,AMQ 1990测试在记录逆行性遗忘方面比本研究中使用的其他量表(更)敏感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验