Suppr超能文献

头痛患者停用药物过度使用:治疗反应性的恢复

Discontinuation of medication overuse in headache patients: recovery of therapeutic responsiveness.

作者信息

Zeeberg P, Olesen J, Jensen R

机构信息

Danish Headache Centre, Department of Neurology, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark.

出版信息

Cephalalgia. 2006 Oct;26(10):1192-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01190.x.

Abstract

It is generally accepted that ongoing medication overuse nullifies the effect of prophylactic treatment, although few data support this contention. We set out to describe the treatment outcome in patients withdrawn from medication overuse and relate any improvement to a renewed effect of prophylaxis. For patients with probable medication-overuse headache (pMOH), treated and dismissed from the Danish Headache Centre in 2002 and 2003, we assed, from prospective headache diaries, the headache frequency before and after withdrawal of offending drugs and compared these frequencies with the headache frequency at dismissal. Among 1326 patients, 337 had pMOH. Eligible were 175, mean age 49 years, male/female ratio 1 : 2.7. Overall, there was a 46% decrease in headache frequency from the first visit to dismissal (P < 0.0001). Patients with no improvement 2 months after complete drug withdrawal (N = 88) subsequently responded to pharmacological and/or non-pharmacological prophylaxis with a 26% decrease in headache frequency as measured from the end of withdrawal to dismissal (P < 0.0001). At dismissal, 47% were on prophylaxis. Former non-responders to medical prophylaxis had a 49% decrease in headache frequency from first visit to dismissal (P < 0.0001), whereas those who had never received prophylaxis had a 56% reduction (P < 0.0001). This difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.22). Almost all MOH patients benefit from drug withdrawal, either just from the withdrawal or by transformation from therapeutic non-responsiveness to responsiveness. According to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd edn, the MOH diagnosis requires improvement after drug withdrawal. Our data suggest that these diagnostic criteria are too strict.

摘要

人们普遍认为,持续过度用药会抵消预防性治疗的效果,尽管几乎没有数据支持这一观点。我们着手描述停止过度用药的患者的治疗结果,并将任何改善与预防性治疗的重新起效联系起来。对于2002年和2003年在丹麦头痛中心接受治疗并出院的可能患有药物过量使用性头痛(pMOH)的患者,我们通过前瞻性头痛日记评估了停用致病药物前后的头痛频率,并将这些频率与出院时的头痛频率进行了比较。在1326名患者中,337名患有pMOH。符合条件的有175名,平均年龄49岁,男女比例为1:2.7。总体而言,从首次就诊到出院,头痛频率下降了46%(P<0.0001)。完全停药2个月后无改善的患者(N=88)随后对药物和/或非药物预防有反应,从停药结束到出院时测量,头痛频率下降了26%(P<0.0001)。出院时,47%的患者正在接受预防治疗。以前对药物预防无反应的患者从首次就诊到出院时头痛频率下降了49%(P<0.0001),而那些从未接受过预防治疗的患者头痛频率下降了56%(P<0.0001)。这种差异无统计学意义(P=0.22)。几乎所有药物过量使用性头痛患者都从停药中获益,要么仅仅通过停药,要么通过从治疗无反应转变为有反应。根据《国际头痛疾病分类》第2版,药物过量使用性头痛的诊断需要停药后有所改善。我们的数据表明,这些诊断标准过于严格。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验