Leonard Sarah K, Ferry-Leeper Penelope, Mailman Richard B
Department of Pharmacology, CB #7160, 7011 NC Neurosciences Hospital, University of North Carolina, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7160, USA.
Brain Res. 2006 Oct 30;1117(1):25-37. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.024. Epub 2006 Sep 7.
Whereas structurally dissimilar D(1) antagonists competing for [(3)H]-SCH23390 binding recognize primarily one site in striatum, two distinct affinity states are observed in both amygdala and hippocampus. The binding profile of SCH23390 is similar in both of these regions, with the high affinity site (K(D) approximately 0.4 nM) consistent with D(1)/D(5) receptors. The appearance of the low affinity site (K(D) approximately 300 nM) is dependent upon the absence of MgCl(2), but independent of D(1) expression (i.e., still present in D(1) knockout mice). Although the density of high affinity state receptor is lower in hippocampus or amygdala of D(1) knockout mice, some residual binding remains, consistent with the known expression of D(5) receptors in these regions. Remarkably, in hippocampus, the affinity of the low affinity site is shifted rightward in the presence of the D(2) antagonist domperidone and is largely absent in the hippocampus of D(2) knockout animals. Additionally, this site is also shifted rightward in the presence of the A(2A) ligands SCH58261, CSC, or NECA, or in the absence of A(2A) receptors. The affinity of SCH23390 for this low affinity site is greater than seen for SCH23390 binding to D(2) receptors in heterologous expression systems, consistent with the hypothesis that both D(2) and A(2A) receptors are involved in the low affinity binding site. Therefore, we suggest that the heteromerization of D(2) and A(2A) receptors reported previously in vitro also may occur in the brain of both rats and mice.
虽然结构不同的D(1)拮抗剂竞争[(3)H]-SCH23390结合主要识别纹状体中的一个位点,但在杏仁核和海马体中均观察到两种不同的亲和状态。SCH23390在这两个区域的结合特征相似,高亲和力位点(K(D)约为0.4 nM)与D(1)/D(5)受体一致。低亲和力位点(K(D)约为300 nM)的出现取决于MgCl(2)的缺失,但与D(1)表达无关(即在D(1)基因敲除小鼠中仍然存在)。虽然D(1)基因敲除小鼠海马体或杏仁核中高亲和力状态受体的密度较低,但仍有一些残留结合,这与这些区域中已知的D(5)受体表达一致。值得注意的是,在海马体中,低亲和力位点的亲和力在D(2)拮抗剂多潘立酮存在时向右移动,并且在D(2)基因敲除动物的海马体中基本不存在。此外,在A(2A)配体SCH58261、CSC或NECA存在时,或在没有A(2A)受体时,该位点也向右移动。SCH23390对该低亲和力位点的亲和力大于其在异源表达系统中与D(2)受体结合时的亲和力,这与D(2)和A(2A)受体都参与低亲和力结合位点的假设一致。因此,我们认为先前在体外报道的D(2)和A(2A)受体的异源二聚化也可能发生在大鼠和小鼠的大脑中。