Suppr超能文献

使用20极标测导管对异位房性心动过速进行右心房消融

[Right atrial ablation of ectopic atrial tachycardia using a 20-pole mapping catheter].

作者信息

Schueller P O, Meyer C, Dierkes S, Perings C, Hennersdorf M G

机构信息

Klinik für Kardiologie, Pneumologie und Angiologie, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik B der Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2006 Sep;17(3):121-6. doi: 10.1007/s00399-006-0522-0.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Ectopic atrial tachycardia (EAT) are frequently unresponsive to pharmacological antiarrhythmic therapy. Radiofrequency ablation seems to be a safe approach to treat those arrhythmias. In the present study we report our results of radiofrequency ablation of EAT with a new mapping system (Stablemapr, Medtronic).

METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients with right atrial tachycardia were included in the study. In 15 patients (G1) the 20-polar Stablemapr was used for localization of the arrhythmia foci. Data were compared with a control group (G2, n=15), in which mapping was performed conventionally. The demographic characteristics and the distribution of the different cardiac diseases were comparable in both groups. In group 1 the identification of the EAT was facilitated by the placement of the 20-pole mapping catheter in the right atrium. In group 2 point by point measurements were performed to find the earliest local atrial activation compared to a reference electrode in the high right atrium (activation mapping), or foci were identified by analysis of the P-wave morphology during stimulation (pacemapping).

RESULTS

It was possible to successfully ablate all atrial tachycardias. The distribution of the foci was similar in both groups (G1/G2): near to the superior (3/5) and inferior (1/0) caval vene ostium, on the free wall (3/3), at the coronary sinus ostium (3/3) and on the interatrial septum (5/4). The mean procedure (G1: 88+/-33 vs G2: 151+/-61 min; p= or <0.05) and fluoroscopic times (G1: 19+/-9 vs G2: 38+/-28 min; p= or <0.05) were significantly shorter in group 1. Moreover, the mean number of radiofrequency applications was reduced significantly by using the new mapping system (G1: 10+/-10 vs G2: 16+/-13; p= or <0.05).

CONCLUSION

Radiofrequency ablation of EAT with right atrial focus can be performed safely and successfully using a 20-pole mapping catheter. The greatest advantages compared to conventional mapping and ablation strategies lies in the shortened investigation and fluoroscopic time.

摘要

引言

异位房性心动过速(EAT)通常对药物抗心律失常治疗无反应。射频消融似乎是治疗这些心律失常的一种安全方法。在本研究中,我们报告了使用新的标测系统(美敦力公司的Stablemapr)对EAT进行射频消融的结果。

方法

连续30例右房心动过速患者纳入本研究。15例患者(G1组)使用20极Stablemapr进行心律失常灶定位。数据与对照组(G2组,n = 15)进行比较,对照组采用传统标测方法。两组的人口统计学特征和不同心脏病的分布情况具有可比性。在G1组,通过将20极标测导管置于右心房来辅助识别EAT。在G2组,进行逐点测量以找到相对于右房高位参考电极最早的局部心房激动(激动标测),或通过刺激期间P波形态分析来识别病灶(起搏标测)。

结果

所有房性心动过速均成功消融。两组(G1/G2)病灶分布相似:靠近上腔(3/5)和下腔(1/0)静脉口、游离壁(3/3)、冠状窦口(3/3)和房间隔(5/4)。G1组的平均手术时间(88±33分钟 vs G2组:151±61分钟;p≤0.05)和透视时间(G1组:19±9分钟 vs G2组:38±28分钟;p≤0.05)明显更短。此外,使用新标测系统显著减少了平均射频应用次数(G1组:10±10次 vs G2组:16±13次;p≤0.05)。

结论

使用20极标测导管可安全、成功地对右房起源的EAT进行射频消融。与传统标测和消融策略相比,最大的优势在于缩短了检查和透视时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验