Coffey Charles S, Ebert Charles S, Marshall Allen F, Skaggs John D, Falk Stephanie E, Crocker William D, Pearson James M, Fitzpatrick Douglas C
Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, CB #7070, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 101 Medical Research Building A, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7070, USA.
Hear Res. 2006 Nov;221(1-2):1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.06.005. Epub 2006 Sep 15.
A critical binaural cue important for sound localization and detection of signals in noise is the interaural time difference (ITD), or difference in the time of arrival of sounds at each ear. The ITD can be determined by cross-correlating the sounds at the two ears and finding the ITD where the correlation is maximal. The amount of interaural correlation is affected by properties of spaces and can therefore be used to assess spatial attributes. To examine the neural basis for sensitivity to the overall level of the interaural correlation, we identified subcollicular neurons and neurons in the inferior colliculus (IC) and auditory cortex of unanesthetized rabbits that were sensitive to ITDs and examined their responses as the interaural correlation was varied. Neurons at each brain level could show linear or non-linear responses to changes in interaural correlation. The direction of the non-linearities in most neurons was to increase the slope of the response change for correlations near 1.0. The proportion of neurons with non-linear responses was similar in subcollicular and IC neurons but increased in the auditory cortex. Non-linear response functions to interaural correlation were not related to the type of response as determined by the tuning to ITDs across frequencies. The responses to interaural correlation were also not related to the frequency tuning of the neuron, unlike the responses to ITD, which broadens for neurons tuned to lower frequencies. The neural discriminibility of the ITD using frozen noise in the best neurons was similar to the behavioral acuity in humans at a reference correlation of 1.0. However, for other reference ITDs the neural discriminibility was more linear and generally better than the human discriminibility of the interaural correlation, suggesting that stimulus rather than neural variability is the basis for the decline in human performance at lower levels of interaural correlation.
对于声音定位以及在噪声中检测信号而言,一个关键的双耳线索是耳间时间差(ITD),即声音到达每只耳朵的时间差异。可以通过对两只耳朵处的声音进行互相关,并找到相关性最大处的ITD来确定ITD。耳间相关性的大小受空间特性影响,因此可用于评估空间属性。为了研究对耳间相关性整体水平敏感度的神经基础,我们在未麻醉的兔子的下丘以下神经元、下丘(IC)和听觉皮层中识别出对ITD敏感的神经元,并在改变耳间相关性时检查它们的反应。每个脑区的神经元对耳间相关性变化可表现出线性或非线性反应。大多数神经元的非线性方向是在相关性接近1.0时增加反应变化的斜率。下丘以下神经元和IC神经元中具有非线性反应的神经元比例相似,但在听觉皮层中增加。对耳间相关性的非线性反应函数与通过跨频率对ITD的调谐所确定的反应类型无关。与对ITD的反应不同,对耳间相关性的反应也与神经元的频率调谐无关,对ITD的反应在调谐到较低频率的神经元中会变宽。在最佳神经元中使用冻结噪声时,ITD的神经辨别力与人类在参考相关性为1.0时的行为敏锐度相似。然而,对于其他参考ITD,神经辨别力更呈线性,并且总体上优于人类对耳间相关性的辨别力,这表明在较低耳间相关性水平下人类表现下降的基础是刺激而非神经变异性。