Chang Jen-Ping, Chen Mien-Cheng, Kao Chiung-Lun, Yang Cheng-Hsu, Yu Teng-Hung, Chen Chien-Jen
Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, College of Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Kaohsiung Medical Center, Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
World J Surg. 2006 Oct;30(10):1802-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0382-0.
We assessed whether the simultaneous sequential strategy could (1) achieve additional sinus restoration for those patients who were not in sinus rhythm while coming off bypass after modified left maze procedure and (2) attain the same long-term success rates as the bi-atrial maze procedure in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and mitral valve disease.
Twenty-seven consecutive patients - ten men and 17 women with a mean age of 52 +/- 13 years, all with persistent AF and mitral valve disease - underwent the modified maze procedure with the simultaneous sequential strategy. In the first phase, the modified left atrial maze operation was carried out with concomitant valvular surgery; the right side maze operation was subsequently carried out as a second phase of the sequential strategy only if AF re-appeared following the spontaneous restoration of heart beats during the operation.
Twenty patients (74.1%) underwent the left atrial maze procedure only, and seven patients (25.9%) required the subsequent right atrial maze procedure as part of the sequential strategy. At a mean follow-up of 15.1 +/- 7.7 months, six of the 27 patients (22.2%) who underwent additional right atrial maze procedure had restored sinus rhythm. At a mean follow-up of 17.8 +/- 7.3 months, 24 of the 27 patients (88.9%) had restored sinus rhythm and 22 patients (81.5%) had restored bi-atrial transport function (right atrial filling fraction: 40.8 +/- 11.7%; left atrial filling fraction: 22.9 +/- 8.1%) after application of the sequential strategy.
Compared with modified left atrial maze procedure, the application of the simultaneous sequential strategy successfully restored sinus rhythm in an additional 22.2% of patients with persistent AF. The overall sinus conversion rate of 88.9% was comparable with that of the standard bi-atrial maze procedure.
我们评估了同步序贯策略是否能够(1)为那些在改良左心房迷宫手术后脱离体外循环时未处于窦性心律的患者实现额外的窦律恢复,以及(2)在持续性心房颤动(AF)和二尖瓣疾病患者中获得与双心房迷宫手术相同的长期成功率。
连续27例患者——10例男性和17例女性,平均年龄52±13岁,均患有持续性AF和二尖瓣疾病——接受了采用同步序贯策略的改良迷宫手术。在第一阶段,进行改良左心房迷宫手术并同时进行瓣膜手术;仅当术中心跳自发恢复后AF再次出现时,才作为序贯策略的第二阶段进行右侧迷宫手术。
20例患者(74.1%)仅接受了左心房迷宫手术,7例患者(25.9%)需要后续的右心房迷宫手术作为序贯策略的一部分。平均随访15.1±7.7个月时,接受额外右心房迷宫手术的27例患者中有6例(22.2%)恢复了窦性心律。平均随访17.8±7.3个月时,27例患者中有24例(88.9%)恢复了窦性心律,22例患者(81.5%)在应用序贯策略后恢复了双心房传输功能(右心房充盈分数:40.8±11.7%;左心房充盈分数:22.9±8.1%)。
与改良左心房迷宫手术相比,同步序贯策略的应用成功使另外22.2%的持续性AF患者恢复了窦性心律。88.9%的总体窦律转复率与标准双心房迷宫手术相当。