Suppr超能文献

《卫生专业人员继续教育杂志》中研究成果向实践的转化:对第1卷至第24卷的主题分析

Research to practice in The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions: a thematic analysis of volumes 1 through 24.

作者信息

MacIntosh-Murray Anu, Perrier Laure, Davis David

机构信息

Department of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Summer;26(3):230-43. doi: 10.1002/chp.76.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Authors have stressed the importance of the broader contextual influences on practice improvement and learning and have expressed concern about gaps between research and practice. This implies a potential expansion of the knowledge base for continuing education in the health professions (CEHP) and an increased emphasis on research evidence for that knowledge. How has the content of The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions (JCEHP) reflected those changes? What are the implications for CEHP practitioners?

METHODS

Based on all abstracts, tables of contents, and editorials, a thematic analysis was completed for volumes 1 through 24 of JCEHP. All texts were downloaded into qualitative analysis software and coded. Main code categories included demographics of articles, concepts relating to CEHP as a discipline, knowledge translation and outcomes-oriented continuing education, and theories and frameworks. Key themes were identified.

RESULTS

Key themes include categories of topics included in JCEHP over the years, the increased prominence of research in JCEHP, a dual research evidence-to-practice gap, the professionalization of continuing education providers, and interdisciplinarity and the links with broader frameworks that have been proposed for CEHP.

DISCUSSION

Two sets of research-to-practice gaps are portrayed in the journal: the gap between clinical research and practice and the gap between research and practice in CEHP. To close the first gap, authors have asserted that the second gap must be addressed, ensuring that CEHP practices themselves are evidence based, driven by theory-based research. This is a variation on prior debates regarding the need to define CEHP as a discipline, which uses the language of professionalization. The increased focus of continuing education on the contexts of health care providers' practices has multiplied the topics that are potentially relevant to CEHP practice.

摘要

引言

作者们强调了更广泛的背景因素对实践改进和学习的重要性,并对研究与实践之间的差距表示担忧。这意味着健康职业继续教育(CEHP)的知识基础可能会扩大,并且对该知识的研究证据的重视程度会增加。《健康职业继续教育杂志》(JCEHP)的内容如何反映这些变化?这对CEHP从业者有何影响?

方法

基于所有摘要、目录和社论,对JCEHP第1卷至第24卷进行了主题分析。所有文本都下载到定性分析软件中并进行编码。主要代码类别包括文章的人口统计学特征、与作为一门学科的CEHP相关的概念、知识转化和以结果为导向的继续教育,以及理论和框架。确定了关键主题。

结果

关键主题包括多年来JCEHP中包含的主题类别、JCEHP中研究的日益突出、研究证据与实践之间的双重差距、继续教育提供者的专业化,以及跨学科性和与为CEHP提出的更广泛框架的联系。

讨论

该杂志描绘了两组研究与实践之间的差距:临床研究与实践之间的差距以及CEHP中研究与实践之间的差距。为了弥合第一个差距,作者们断言必须解决第二个差距,确保CEHP实践本身以证据为基础,由基于理论的研究驱动。这是先前关于将CEHP定义为一门学科的必要性的辩论的一种变体,该辩论使用了专业化的语言。继续教育对医疗保健提供者实践背景的日益关注,增加了与CEHP实践潜在相关的主题数量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验