Ambler Jonathan J S, Deakin Charles D
Shackleton Department of Anaesthetics, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
Resuscitation. 2006 Nov;71(2):146-51. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.03.017. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
Biphasic waveforms have similar or greater efficacy at cardioverting atrial and ventricular arrhythmias at lower energy levels than monophasic waveforms, and cause less ST depression following defibrillation of ventricular fibrillation. No studies have investigated this effect on ST change with atrial arrhythmias. We studied the efficacy of the Welch Allyn-MRL PIC biphasic defibrillator.
One hundred and thirty-nine patients undergoing elective DC cardioversion for atrial arrhythmias were randomised to cardioversion by monophasic (Hewlett Packard Codemaster XL; 100, 200, 300, 360 and 360J) or biphasic (Welch Allyn-MRL PIC; 70, 100, 150, 200 and 300J) defibrillator. We analysed success of cardioversion after 0 and 30min, cumulative energy, number of shocks and energy at successful cardioversion. The ST change in the recorded electrocardiogram was measured at 15s after all shocks using electronic callipers.
Immediately after cardioversion 59/68 (86.8%) of the monophasic group versus 56/60 (93.3%) of the biphasic group were in sinus rhythm. Of the monophasic group, 55/67 (82.1%) remained in sinus rhythm at 30min versus 53/58 (91.4%) of the biphasic group. These differences were not significant at 0min (P=0.35) or 30min (P=0.21). The biphasic group required significantly fewer shocks (P=0.006), less cumulative energy (P<0.0001) and required lower total energy for successful cardioversion (P<0.0001). Of the 102 patients with electrocardiogram recordings suitable for analysis, ST segment change was greater in the monophasic group (P=0.037).
The Welch Allyn-MRL biphasic waveform for DC cardioversion results in fewer shocks, with less cumulative energy delivered and less post shock ST change than with a Hewlett Packard Codemaster XL damped sine wave monophasic waveform.
与单相波相比,双相波在较低能量水平下转复房性和室性心律失常时具有相似或更高的疗效,且在心室颤动除颤后引起的ST段压低较少。尚无研究调查其对房性心律失常ST段变化的影响。我们研究了伟伦 - MRL PIC双相除颤器的疗效。
139例因房性心律失常接受择期直流电复律的患者被随机分为使用单相除颤器(惠普Codemaster XL;100、200、300、360和360J)或双相除颤器(伟伦 - MRL PIC;70、100、150、200和300J)进行复律。我们分析了复律后0分钟和30分钟时的复律成功率、累积能量、电击次数以及成功复律时的能量。使用电子卡尺在所有电击后15秒测量记录心电图中的ST段变化。
复律后即刻,单相波组68例中的59例(86.8%)与双相波组60例中的56例(93.3%)转为窦性心律。单相波组中,67例中的55例(82.1%)在30分钟时仍为窦性心律,而双相波组58例中的53例(91.4%)仍为窦性心律。这些差异在0分钟时(P = 0.35)或30分钟时(P = 0.21)无统计学意义。双相波组所需电击次数明显较少(P = 0.006),累积能量较少(P < 0.0001),成功复律所需的总能量较低(P < 0.0001)。在102例适合分析的心电图记录患者中,单相波组的ST段变化更大(P = 0.037)。
伟伦 - MRL双相波用于直流电复律时,与惠普Codemaster XL阻尼正弦波单相波相比,电击次数更少,传递的累积能量更少,电击后ST段变化更小。