Tzou Wendy S, Korcarz Claudia E, Aeschlimann Susan E, Stein James H
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006 Oct;19(10):1286-92. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2006.04.038.
We sought to evaluate the accuracy of carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) measurements by a nonsonographer clinician using hand-held ultrasound (HHU).
Use of a HHU for point-of-care CIMT measurement has not been tested previously.
Participants underwent reference ultrasound and HHU studies. HHU validity was tested by an expert sonographer. Nonsonographer clinician accuracy using the HHU was tested against the expert sonographer. CIMT bioequivalence was tested with .5 pixel limits.
The 75 participants were (mean [SD]) 55 [7] years old. CIMT values were bioequivalent (0.714 [0.029] vs 0.685 [0.029] mm, phase I; 0.697 [0.015] vs 0.687 [0.015] mm, phase II; P(two 1-sided t test) < .05). Agreement was 80% for CIMT classifications (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.451, P < .001) and 90% for plaque presence (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.797, P < .001).
CIMT measured by HHU was bioequivalent to a reference ultrasound system, when used by an expert sonographer or nonsonographer clinician. Clinical classifications by CIMT quartile and plaque presence were similar. HHU may be suitable for office-based atherosclerosis screening.
我们试图评估非超声检查医师使用手持式超声(HHU)测量颈动脉内膜中层厚度(CIMT)的准确性。
此前尚未测试过使用HHU进行即时护理CIMT测量的情况。
参与者接受了参考超声和HHU检查。由专业超声医师测试HHU的有效性。将非超声检查医师使用HHU的准确性与专业超声医师进行对比测试。使用0.5像素的限值测试CIMT的生物等效性。
75名参与者的年龄为(均值[标准差])55[7]岁。CIMT值具有生物等效性(第一阶段:0.714[0.029]毫米对0.685[0.029]毫米;第二阶段:0.697[0.015]毫米对0.687[0.015]毫米;双侧单侧t检验P<.05)。CIMT分类的一致性为80%(组内相关系数=0.451,P<.001),斑块存在情况的一致性为90%(组内相关系数=0.797,P<.001)。
当由专业超声医师或非超声检查医师使用时,HHU测量的CIMT与参考超声系统具有生物等效性。根据CIMT四分位数和斑块存在情况进行的临床分类相似。HHU可能适用于基于办公室的动脉粥样硬化筛查。