Drago Valeria, Jeong Yong, Crucian Gregory P, Fitzgerald David B, Finney Glen R, Mizuno Tomoyuki, Pisani Francesco, Heilman Kenneth M
Department of Neurology and Center for Neuropsychological Studies, University of Florida College of Medicine, and Neurology Service, Department of Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Gainesville, Florida 32610-0236, USA.
Neurocase. 2006 Aug;12(4):207-11. doi: 10.1080/13554790600598758.
Patients with ipsilateral neglect (IN) bisect lines toward contralesional space. It has been posited that IN might be induced by an attempt at compensation, as part of the crossover effect, where patients with an ipsilesional bias when bisecting long lines, cross over and develop a contralesional bias on short lines or as a release of an approach (grasp) behavior that might be attentional or intentional. To test these alternative hypotheses we had a patient with IN from a right medial frontal lesion bisect lines that contained no cue, a left-sided cue, a right-sided cue, and bilateral cues. If this patient had ipsilateral neglect (IN) because of a crossover effect or compensation, right-sided cues should have influenced bisection more than left-sided cues. We, however, found that only left-sided cues induced a significant change (left-sided deviation) providing support for the attentional-approach (grasp) hypothesis. Further support of this contralesional attentional grasp hypothesis comes from the observation that this patient also had ipsilesional extinction to simultaneous stimuli.
患有同侧偏侧忽视(IN)的患者在二等分线段时会向对侧空间偏移。有人提出,IN可能是由一种补偿尝试所诱发的,这是交叉效应的一部分,即患者在二等分长线时存在同侧偏向,但在二等分短线时会交叉并产生对侧偏向,或者是作为一种可能是注意力或意图性的接近(抓取)行为的释放。为了检验这些替代假说,我们让一名因右侧额叶内侧病变而患有IN的患者对包含无提示、左侧提示、右侧提示和双侧提示的线段进行二等分。如果该患者因交叉效应或补偿而存在同侧偏侧忽视(IN),那么右侧提示对二等分的影响应该比左侧提示更大。然而,我们发现只有左侧提示引起了显著变化(左侧偏移),这为注意力-接近(抓取)假说提供了支持。对这种对侧注意力抓取假说的进一步支持来自于这样的观察,即该患者对同时出现的刺激也存在同侧消退。