Suppr超能文献

多种干预措施改善治疗监测:一项随机试验

Improved therapeutic monitoring with several interventions: a randomized trial.

作者信息

Feldstein Adrianne C, Smith David H, Perrin Nancy, Yang Xiuhai, Rix Mary, Raebel Marsha A, Magid David J, Simon Steven R, Soumerai Stephen B

机构信息

Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, OR, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2006 Sep 25;166(17):1848-54. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.17.1848.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medication errors are frequently related to failure to appropriately select medications or adjust for laboratory parameters. Differences between guideline recommendations and actual frequency of therapeutic laboratory monitoring are substantial. This study evaluated interventions to improve laboratory monitoring at initiation of medication therapy.

METHODS

This cluster-randomized trial compared 3 interventions to usual care for 10 medications in 15 primary care clinics in a health maintenance organization with an electronic medical record system. Eligible patients, identified from electronic databases, had not received recommended laboratory monitoring within 5 days after new dispensing of a study medication. Interventions were an electronic medical record reminder to the prescribing health care professional, an automated voice message to the patient, and a pharmacy team outreach to the patient. Primary outcome was completion of all recommended baseline laboratory monitoring.

RESULTS

A total of 961 patients participated in the study. At 25 days, 95 (48.5%) of 196 patients in the electronic medical record reminder group, 177 (66.3%) of 267 in the automated voice message group, 214 (82.0%) of 261 in the pharmacy team outreach group, and 53 (22.4%) of 237 in the usual care group had completed all recommended baseline laboratory monitoring (P<.001). After adjustments, the hazard ratios for completing laboratory monitoring compared with usual care were 2.5 (95% confidence interval, 1.8-3.5) for electronic medical record reminder, 4.1 (95% confidence interval, 3.0-5.6) for automated voice message, and 6.7 (95% confidence interval, 4.9-9.0) for pharmacy team outreach.

CONCLUSIONS

All 3 interventions were effective in increasing laboratory monitoring when initiating new medications in primary care. Further work is necessary to determine if these interventions improve patient outcomes.

摘要

背景

用药错误常常与未能恰当选择药物或根据实验室参数进行调整有关。指南推荐与治疗性实验室监测的实际频率之间存在很大差异。本研究评估了在药物治疗开始时改善实验室监测的干预措施。

方法

这项整群随机试验在一个拥有电子病历系统的健康维护组织的15家初级保健诊所中,将3种干预措施与10种药物的常规护理进行了比较。从电子数据库中识别出的符合条件的患者,在新配给研究药物后5天内未接受推荐的实验室监测。干预措施包括向开处方的医护人员发送电子病历提醒、向患者发送自动语音消息以及药房团队对患者进行随访。主要结局是完成所有推荐的基线实验室监测。

结果

共有961名患者参与了该研究。在25天时,电子病历提醒组的196名患者中有95名(48.5%)、自动语音消息组的267名患者中有177名(66.3%)、药房团队随访组的261名患者中有214名(82.0%)以及常规护理组的237名患者中有53名(22.4%)完成了所有推荐的基线实验室监测(P<0.001)。调整后,与常规护理相比,完成实验室监测的风险比在电子病历提醒组为2.5(95%置信区间,1.8 - 3.5),在自动语音消息组为4.1(95%置信区间,3.0 - 5.6),在药房团队随访组为6.7(95%置信区间,4.9 - 9.0)。

结论

在初级保健中开始使用新药物时,所有3种干预措施在增加实验室监测方面均有效。有必要进一步开展工作以确定这些干预措施是否能改善患者结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验