Lachaine Jean
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(10):955-70. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624100-00004.
Even with the development of the serotonin 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists in recent years, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) remains a significant concern for clinicians and patients. For the selection of an appropriate antiemetic strategy for PONV, economic considerations should be taken into account. A literature search covering the period from September 1996 to August 2005 yielded 16 economic evaluations on antiemetics used for the prevention or treatment of PONV. In these studies, a variety of different antiemetic regimens were evaluated, with different doses and timing of administration, in many different populations, for various types of surgery, and in different settings. In addition, there were many differences in the design of these economic evaluations in terms of the extent of the costs considered and the decision rules used when forming conclusions. Therefore, despite the availability of economic evaluations on antiemetics in PONV, it is difficult to draw clear conclusions with such disparate information. In spite of these limitations, key learning can be drawn from these economic evaluations. From studies where a placebo was used as a comparator, we can conclude that there is clinical benefit in using an antiemetic for the prevention of PONV versus no therapy. The dose of the 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist seems more important in determining cost effectiveness than the selection of the agent itself, and less expensive agents such as droperidol, dexamethasone and prochlorperazine may also represent cost-effective alternatives to 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists. In an additional six studies where a willingness to pay (WTP) to avoid or reduce the incidence of PONV was estimated, the average WTP amounts varied from $US29 to $US117. Many questions remain unanswered about the cost effectiveness of existing antiemetics and their regimens, and little is known about the impact of new agents, such as the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists, in the control of PONV.
尽管近年来5-羟色胺5-HT(3)受体拮抗剂有所发展,但术后恶心呕吐(PONV)仍是临床医生和患者十分关注的问题。为选择合适的PONV止吐策略,应考虑经济因素。一项涵盖1996年9月至2005年8月期间的文献检索,得出了16项关于用于预防或治疗PONV的止吐药的经济评估。在这些研究中,评估了多种不同的止吐方案,包括不同的剂量和给药时间,涉及许多不同人群、各种类型的手术以及不同的环境。此外,这些经济评估在考虑成本的范围和得出结论时所使用的决策规则方面存在许多差异。因此,尽管有关于PONV止吐药的经济评估,但利用这些截然不同的信息很难得出明确结论。尽管存在这些局限性,但仍可从这些经济评估中获得关键经验。从使用安慰剂作为对照的研究中,我们可以得出结论,与不进行治疗相比,使用止吐药预防PONV具有临床益处。在确定成本效益方面,5-HT(3)受体拮抗剂的剂量似乎比药物本身的选择更为重要,而诸如氟哌利多、地塞米松和氯丙嗪等成本较低的药物也可能是5-HT(3)受体拮抗剂具有成本效益的替代方案。在另外六项估计为避免或降低PONV发生率而愿意支付(WTP)的研究中,平均WTP金额从29美元到117美元不等。关于现有止吐药及其方案的成本效益,仍有许多问题未得到解答,而且对于诸如神经激肽-1受体拮抗剂等新药在控制PONV方面的影响知之甚少。