Sieffert Nicolas, Wipff Georges
Laboratoire MSM, UMR CNRS 7177, Institut de Chimie, 4 rue B. Pascal, 67 000 Strasbourg, France.
J Phys Chem B. 2006 Oct 5;110(39):19497-506. doi: 10.1021/jp063045g.
We report a molecular dynamics (MD) study of the interfacial behavior of key partners involved in the Cs(+) cation extraction by a calix[4]arene-crown-6 host (L), comparing an ionic liquid (IL) to a classical molecular solvent (chloroform) as receiving "oil" phase. The IL is composed of hydrophobic 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium cations (BMI(+)) and bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide anions (Tf(2)N(-)) and forms a biphasic system with water. The simulations reveal similarities but also interesting differences between the two types of interfaces. Much longer times are needed to "equilibrate" IL systems, compared to classical liquid mixtures, and there is more intersolvent mixing with the IL than with chloroform, especially concerning the water-in-oil content. There is also some excess of the BMI(+) cations over the Tf(2)N(-) anions in the aqueous phase. Simulations on the Na(+)NO(3)(-) and Cs(+)NO(3)(-) ions show that they sometimes interact at the interface with the IL ions, forming hydrated intimate ion pairs, whereas they are "repelled" by the classical interface. The LCs(+) complex and L ligand also behave differently, depending on the "oil phase". They are better solvated by the IL than by chloroform and thus poorly attracted at the IL interface, whereas they adsorb at the chloroform interface, adopting well-defined amphiphilic orientations. The results are discussed in the context of assisted ion transfer and provide a number of arguments explaining the specificity and efficiency of IL based, compared to classical extraction systems.
我们报告了一项分子动力学(MD)研究,该研究针对杯[4]芳烃 - 冠 - 6主体(L)萃取Cs⁺阳离子过程中关键组分的界面行为,将离子液体(IL)与经典分子溶剂(氯仿)作为接收“油”相进行了比较。该离子液体由疏水性的1 - 丁基 - 3 - 甲基咪唑阳离子(BMI⁺)和双(三氟甲基磺酰)亚胺阴离子(Tf₂N⁻)组成,并与水形成双相体系。模拟结果揭示了两种界面类型之间的相似性以及有趣的差异。与经典液体混合物相比,“平衡”离子液体体系需要更长的时间,并且与离子液体之间的溶剂间混合比与氯仿之间的更多,特别是关于油包水含量。水相中BMI⁺阳离子的含量也比Tf₂N⁻阴离子略多。对Na⁺NO₃⁻和Cs⁺NO₃⁻离子的模拟表明,它们有时在界面处与离子液体离子相互作用,形成水合紧密离子对,而它们被经典界面“排斥”。LCs⁺络合物和L配体的行为也因“油相”而异。它们在离子液体中的溶剂化程度比在氯仿中更好,因此在离子液体界面处的吸引力较差,而它们吸附在氯仿界面上,呈现出明确的两亲性取向。在辅助离子转移的背景下对结果进行了讨论,并提供了一些论据来解释与经典萃取体系相比,基于离子液体的萃取体系的特异性和效率。