Suppr超能文献

在静脉注射丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼和罗库溴铵诱导后,我们是否需要吸入麻醉药来减轻插管时的觉醒及血流动力学反应?

Do we need inhaled anaesthetics to blunt arousal, haemodynamic responses to intubation after i.v. induction with propofol, remifentanil, rocuronium?

作者信息

Coppens M J, Versichelen L F M, Mortier E P, Struys M M R F

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Ghent University Hospital De Pintelaan 185, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2006 Dec;97(6):835-41. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael254. Epub 2006 Sep 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine whether, after propofol, rocuronium and remifentanil rapid sequence induction, inhaled anaesthetic agents should be started before intubation to minimize autonomic and arousal response during intubation.

METHODS

One hundred ASA I and II patients were randomized to receive 1 MAC of desflurane or sevoflurane during manual ventilation or not. Anaesthesia was induced with an effect-site-controlled infusion of remifentanil at 2 ng ml(-1) for 3 min. Patients then received propofol to induce loss of consciousness (LOC). Rocuronium (0.6 mg kg(-1)) was given at LOC and the trachea was intubated after 90 s of manual breathing support (=baseline) with or without inhaled anaesthetics. Vital signs and bispectral index (BIS) were recorded until 10 min post-intubation to detect autonomic and arousal response.

RESULTS

A significant increase in BIS value after intubation was seen in all groups. The increases were mild, even in those not receiving pre-intubation inhaled anaesthetics. However, in contrast to sevoflurane, desflurane appeared to partially blunt the arousal response. Heart rate, systolic and diastolic pressure increase similarly in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Desflurane and sevoflurane were unable to blunt the arousal reflex completely, as measured by BIS, although the reflex was significantly less when desflurane was used. Rapid sequence induction with remifentanil, propofol and rocuronium and without inhaled anaesthetics before intubation can be done without dangerous haemodynamic and arousal responses at intubation after 90 s.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定在丙泊酚、罗库溴铵和瑞芬太尼快速序贯诱导后,是否应在插管前开始使用吸入麻醉剂,以尽量减少插管期间的自主神经和觉醒反应。

方法

100例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为I级和II级的患者被随机分为在手动通气期间接受1最低肺泡有效浓度(MAC)地氟烷或七氟烷组与不接受组。采用效应室控制输注瑞芬太尼,剂量为2 ng/ml,持续3分钟诱导麻醉。然后给予丙泊酚诱导意识消失(LOC)。在LOC时给予罗库溴铵(0.6 mg/kg),在手动呼吸支持90秒(=基线)后,无论有无吸入麻醉剂,均进行气管插管。记录生命体征和脑电双频指数(BIS)直至插管后10分钟,以检测自主神经和觉醒反应。

结果

所有组在插管后BIS值均显著升高。即使在未接受插管前吸入麻醉剂的患者中,升高幅度也较小。然而,与七氟烷相比,地氟烷似乎部分抑制了觉醒反应。所有组的心率、收缩压和舒张压升高情况相似。

结论

以BIS衡量,地氟烷和七氟烷均无法完全抑制觉醒反射,尽管使用地氟烷时该反射明显较弱。在插管前使用瑞芬太尼、丙泊酚和罗库溴铵进行快速序贯诱导且不使用吸入麻醉剂,90秒后插管时不会出现危险的血流动力学和觉醒反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验