González Antonio, Augustin Salvador, Pérez Mercedes, Dot Joan, Saperas Esteban, Tomasello Alejandro, Segarra Antoni, Armengol Josep Ramón, Malagelada Joan Ramón, Esteban Rafael, Guardia Jaime, Genescà Joan
Liver Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Institut de Recerca Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Hepatology. 2006 Oct;44(4):806-12. doi: 10.1002/hep.21343.
The clinical usefulness of assessing hemodynamic response to drug therapy in the prophylaxis of variceal rebleeding is unknown. An open-labeled, uncontrolled pilot trial was performed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of using the hemodynamic response to pharmacological treatment to guide therapy in this setting. Fifty patients with acute variceal bleeding underwent a hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement 5 days after the episode. Nadolol and nitrates were initiated, and a second HVPG was measured 15 days later. Responder patients (> or =20% decrease in HVPG from baseline) were maintained on drugs, partial responders (> or =10% and <20%) had banding ligation added to the drugs, and nonresponders (<10%) received a transjugular intrahepatic portal-systemic shunt (TIPS). Mean follow-up was 22 months. Eight patients (16%) did not receive the second HVPG, 6 of them because of early variceal rebleeding. Of the other 42 patients, 24 were classified as responders (57%); 10 as partial responders (24%), who had banding added; and 8 as nonresponders (19%), who received a TIPS. Patients with cirrhosis of viral etiology compared to alcoholic cirrhosis tended to present more early rebleedings, less response to drugs and needed more TIPS. Variceal rebleeding occurred in 22% of all patients but only in 12% of patients whose hemodynamic response was assessed. The 3 therapeutic groups were not different. In conclusion, using hemodynamic response to pharmacological treatment to guide therapy in secondary prophylaxis to prevent variceal bleeding is feasible and effectively protects patients from rebleeding. In this context, viral cirrhosis seems to present a worse outcome than alcoholic cirrhosis.
评估药物治疗的血流动力学反应在预防静脉曲张再出血中的临床实用性尚不清楚。我们进行了一项开放标签、非对照的试点试验,以评估在此情况下利用血流动力学对药物治疗的反应来指导治疗的可行性和疗效。50例急性静脉曲张出血患者在出血事件发生5天后进行肝静脉压力梯度(HVPG)测量。开始使用纳多洛尔和硝酸盐,15天后测量第二次HVPG。反应者患者(HVPG较基线下降≥20%)继续使用药物治疗,部分反应者(HVPG较基线下降≥10%且<20%)在药物治疗基础上加用套扎术,无反应者(HVPG较基线下降<10%)接受经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)。平均随访22个月。8例患者(16%)未进行第二次HVPG测量,其中6例是因为早期静脉曲张再出血。在其他42例患者中,24例被归类为反应者(57%);10例为部分反应者(24%),加用了套扎术;8例为无反应者(19%),接受了TIPS。与酒精性肝硬化患者相比,病毒性病因肝硬化患者往往出现更多早期再出血,对药物反应较少,需要更多TIPS。所有患者中有22%发生静脉曲张再出血,但在评估血流动力学反应的患者中仅为12%。三个治疗组之间无差异。总之,利用血流动力学对药物治疗的反应来指导二级预防中预防静脉曲张出血的治疗是可行的,并且能有效保护患者免于再出血。在此背景下,病毒性肝硬化似乎比酒精性肝硬化预后更差。