Suppr超能文献

既往有短暂性脑缺血发作或轻度卒中患者的血压中期变异性及高血压可能存在的诊断不足

Medium-term variability of blood pressure and potential underdiagnosis of hypertension in patients with previous transient ischemic attack or minor stroke.

作者信息

Cuffe Robert L, Howard Sally C, Algra Ale, Warlow Charles P, Rothwell Peter M

机构信息

Stroke Prevention Research Unit, Department of Clinical Neurology, University of Oxford, Oxford, England.

出版信息

Stroke. 2006 Nov;37(11):2776-83. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000244761.62073.05. Epub 2006 Sep 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Blood pressure (BP) is a major risk factor for stroke. However, the variability of systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) means that single measurements do not provide a reliable measure of usual BP. Although 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring can correct for the effects of short-term variation, there is also important medium-term variability. The extent of medium-term variability in BP is most marked in patients with a previous transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke. We studied the potential impact of this variability on the likely recognition of hypertension.

METHODS

We analyzed multiple repeated measurements of BP in 3 large cohorts with a TIA or minor stroke: the UK-TIA trial (n=2098), the Dutch TIA trial (n=2953), and the European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST; n=2646). Regression dilution ratios and coefficients of variation were calculated for SBP and DBP from baseline and repeated measurements during the subsequent 12 months. Categorization based on single baseline measurements was also compared with categorization based on the subsequent "usual" BP.

RESULTS

The correlation between measurements of BP at baseline and 3 to 5 months later was poor (R(2) from 0.17 to 0.31 for SBP and from 0.10 to 0.20 for DBP). Categorization of patients by baseline values resulted in substantial misclassification in relation to usual BP. For example, of patients with an SBP <140 mm Hg at baseline, the percentage with a usual SBP >or=140 mm Hg was 31.6% in the UK-TIA trial, 48.2% in the Dutch TIA trial, and 57.7% in the ECST. At least 3 consecutive measurements of SBP <120 mm Hg were required to be >90% certain that subsequent usual SBP would not be >or=140 mm Hg.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the greater medium-term variability of BP in patients with a previous TIA or stroke than in the general population, single measurements of "normal" or "low" BP will substantially underestimate the true prevalence of hypertension.

摘要

背景与目的

血压(BP)是中风的主要危险因素。然而,收缩压和舒张压(SBP和DBP)的变异性意味着单次测量无法可靠地反映通常的血压水平。尽管24小时动态血压监测可以校正短期变异的影响,但也存在重要的中期变异性。血压中期变异性的程度在既往有短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或中风的患者中最为明显。我们研究了这种变异性对高血压可能识别的潜在影响。

方法

我们分析了3个有TIA或轻度中风的大型队列中多次重复测量的血压:英国TIA试验(n = 2098)、荷兰TIA试验(n = 2953)和欧洲颈动脉外科试验(ECST;n = 2646)。计算了基线时以及随后12个月内重复测量的SBP和DBP的回归稀释率和变异系数。还比较了基于单次基线测量的分类与基于随后“通常”血压的分类。

结果

基线时与3至5个月后血压测量之间的相关性较差(SBP的R²为0.17至0.31,DBP的R²为0.10至0.20)。根据基线值对患者进行分类导致与通常血压相关的大量错误分类。例如,在英国TIA试验中,基线时SBP <140 mmHg的患者中,通常SBP≥140 mmHg的百分比为31.6%,在荷兰TIA试验中为48.2%,在ECST中为57.7%。至少需要连续3次测量SBP <120 mmHg,才能有>90%的把握确定随后的通常SBP不会≥140 mmHg。

结论

鉴于既往有TIA或中风的患者血压的中期变异性大于一般人群,单次测量“正常”或“低”血压将大大低估高血压的真实患病率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验