Sun Yu, Latour Robert A
Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634, USA.
J Comput Chem. 2006 Dec;27(16):1908-22. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20488.
Empirical force field-based molecular simulations can provide valuable atomistic-level insights into protein-surface interactions in aqueous solution. While the implicit treatment of solvation effects is desired as a means of improving simulation efficiency, existing implicit solvent models were primarily developed for the simulation of peptide or protein behavior in solution alone, and thus may not be appropriate for protein interactions with synthetic material surfaces. The objective of this research was to calculate the change in free energy as a function of surface-separation distance for peptide-surface interactions using different empirical force field-based implicit solvation models (ACE, ASP, EEF1, and RDIE with the CHARMM 19 force field), and to compare these results with the same calculations conducted using density functional theory (DFT) combined with the self-consistent reaction field (SCRF) implicit solvation model. These comparisons show that distinctly different types of behavior are predicted with each implicit solvation method, with ACE providing the best overall agreement with DFT/SCRF calculations. These results also identify areas where ACE is in need of improvement for this application and provide a basis for subsequent parameter refinement.
基于经验力场的分子模拟能够为水溶液中蛋白质与表面的相互作用提供有价值的原子水平见解。虽然期望通过隐式处理溶剂化效应来提高模拟效率,但现有的隐式溶剂模型主要是为仅模拟溶液中的肽或蛋白质行为而开发的,因此可能不适用于蛋白质与合成材料表面的相互作用。本研究的目的是使用不同的基于经验力场的隐式溶剂化模型(ACE、ASP、EEF1以及带有CHARMM 19力场的RDIE)计算肽与表面相互作用的自由能随表面分离距离的变化,并将这些结果与使用密度泛函理论(DFT)结合自洽反应场(SCRF)隐式溶剂化模型进行的相同计算结果进行比较。这些比较表明,每种隐式溶剂化方法预测的行为类型明显不同,其中ACE与DFT/SCRF计算的总体一致性最佳。这些结果还确定了ACE在该应用中需要改进的领域,并为后续参数优化提供了基础。