Goldberg Jay, Bussard Anne, McNeil Jean, Diamond James
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jefferson Medical College, 834 Chestnut Street, Suite 400, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007 Jan-Feb;30(1):54-8. doi: 10.1007/s00270-005-0369-5.
To compare costs and reimbursements for three different treatments for uterine fibroids.
Costs and reimbursements were collected and analyzed from the Thomas Jefferson University Hospital decision support database from 540 women who underwent abdominal hysterectomy (n = 299), abdominal myomectomy (n = 105), or uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) (n = 136) for uterine fibroids during 2000-2002. We used the chi-square test and ANOVA, followed by Fisher's Least Significant Difference test, for statistical analysis.
The mean total hospital cost (US dollar) for UFE was 2,707 dollars, which was significantly less than for hysterectomy (5,707 dollars) or myomectomy (5,676 dollars) (p < 0.05). The mean hospital net income (hospital net reimbursement minus total hospital cost) for UFE was 57 dollars, which was significantly greater than for hysterectomy (-572 dollars) or myomectomy (-715 dollars) (p < 0.05). The mean professional (physician) reimbursements for UFE, hysterectomy, and myomectomy were 1,306 dollars, 979 dollars, and 1,078 dollars, respectively.
UFE has lower hospital costs and greater hospital net income than abdominal hysterectomy or abdominal myomectomy for treating uterine fibroids. UFE may be more financially advantageous than hysterectomy or myomectomy for the insurer, hospital, and health care system. Costs and reimbursements may vary amongst different hospitals and regions.
比较三种不同子宫肌瘤治疗方法的成本和报销情况。
从托马斯·杰斐逊大学医院决策支持数据库中收集并分析了2000 - 2002年间因子宫肌瘤接受腹部子宫切除术(n = 299)、腹部肌瘤切除术(n = 105)或子宫肌瘤栓塞术(UFE)(n = 136)的540名女性的成本和报销情况。我们使用卡方检验和方差分析,随后进行Fisher最小显著差异检验进行统计分析。
UFE的平均总住院成本(美元)为2707美元,显著低于子宫切除术(5707美元)或肌瘤切除术(5676美元)(p < 0.05)。UFE的平均医院净收入(医院净报销减去总住院成本)为57美元,显著高于子宫切除术(-572美元)或肌瘤切除术(-715美元)(p < 0.05)。UFE、子宫切除术和肌瘤切除术的平均专业(医生)报销分别为1306美元、979美元和1078美元。
对于治疗子宫肌瘤,UFE的住院成本低于腹部子宫切除术或腹部肌瘤切除术,且医院净收入更高。对于保险公司、医院和医疗保健系统而言,UFE在经济上可能比子宫切除术或肌瘤切除术更具优势。不同医院和地区的成本及报销情况可能有所不同。