Suppr超能文献

脑转移瘤患者的当前治疗方法。

Current therapeutic approaches in patients with brain metastases.

作者信息

Peacock Kevin H, Lesser Glenn J

机构信息

Section of Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.

出版信息

Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2006 Nov;7(6):479-89. doi: 10.1007/s11864-006-0023-8.

Abstract

The development of brain metastases is often viewed as the end stage of a disease course and engenders skepticism about the efficacy of treatment. Aggressive management of brain metastases is effective in both symptom palliation and the prolongation of life. The majority of patients with controlled intracranial metastases will expire from systemic disease rather than from recurrence of these metastases. Single brain metastases should be treated with surgical resection or stereotactic radiosurgery, though it is unclear at this time if one modality is more effective than the other. Surgical resection is preferred when a pathologic diagnosis is needed, for tumors larger than 3.5 cm, or when immediate tumor mass decompression is required. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) should be applied for single tumors less than 3.5 cm in surgically inaccessible areas and for patients who are not surgical candidates. Small tumors (ie, < 3.5 cm) that cause minimal edema and are surgically accessible may be treated with either surgery or SRS. There is controversy over whether whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) can be omitted following surgical resection or SRS. Omission of WBRT increases intracranial tumor recurrence; however, this has not been correlated with decreased survival. Clinicians who choose to omit upfront WBRT are obligated to monitor the patient closely for intracranial recurrence, at which time further salvage therapy in the form of surgery, SRS, or WBRT may be considered. Histology is of particular importance when considering WBRT for patients with radioresistant tumors such as melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, or sarcoma. WBRT may be of less clinical benefit in this setting. Chemotherapy has been demonstrated to improve response rates when used as an adjunct to radiation therapy. These improvements in response rates have not been correlated with an improvement in median survival. Noncytotoxic radiosensitizing agents such as motexafin and efaproxiral show promise. Phase III trials to assess the benefit of motexafin in patients with metastatic lung cancer and efaproxiral in patients with metastatic breast cancer are ongoing. Targeted therapies offer promise in achieving therapeutic efficacy while minimizing side effects. Surgical adjuncts such as BCNU (carmustine) wafers and the GliaSite Radiation System (Cytyc Corporation, Marlborough, MA) may be useful in the future in achieving optimal local tumor control.

摘要

脑转移瘤的发生通常被视为疾病进程的终末期,这引发了人们对治疗效果的怀疑。积极治疗脑转移瘤在缓解症状和延长生命方面均有效。大多数颅内转移瘤得到控制的患者将死于全身性疾病,而非这些转移瘤的复发。单个脑转移瘤应采用手术切除或立体定向放射外科治疗,不过目前尚不清楚哪种方式更有效。当需要病理诊断、肿瘤大于3.5 cm或需要立即进行肿瘤肿块减压时,首选手术切除。立体定向放射外科(SRS)适用于位于手术难以到达区域且直径小于3.5 cm的单个肿瘤,以及不适合手术的患者。引起最小程度水肿且手术可及的小肿瘤(即<3.5 cm),可采用手术或SRS治疗。对于手术切除或SRS后是否可省略全脑放疗(WBRT)存在争议。省略WBRT会增加颅内肿瘤复发;然而,这与生存率降低并无关联。选择省略 upfront WBRT的临床医生有义务密切监测患者是否发生颅内复发,此时可考虑采用手术、SRS或WBRT等进一步的挽救性治疗。在考虑对黑色素瘤、肾细胞癌或肉瘤等放射抗拒性肿瘤患者进行WBRT时,组织学尤为重要。在这种情况下,WBRT的临床益处可能较小。化疗作为放疗的辅助手段已被证明可提高缓解率。这些缓解率的提高与中位生存期的改善并无关联。非细胞毒性放射增敏剂如莫替沙芬和依福普胺显示出前景。评估莫替沙芬对转移性肺癌患者和依福普胺对转移性乳腺癌患者益处的III期试验正在进行中。靶向治疗有望在实现治疗效果的同时将副作用降至最低。手术辅助手段如卡莫司汀(BCNU)晶片和GliaSite放射系统(Cytyc公司,马萨诸塞州马尔伯勒)未来可能有助于实现最佳的局部肿瘤控制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验