Kent Ray D
University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2006 Oct;37(4):268-70. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2006/030).
This commentary is written in response to a companion paper by Nan Bernstein Ratner (Evidence-Based Practice: An Examination of its Ramifications for the Practice of Speech-Language Pathology).
The comments reflect my experience as Vice President for Research and Technology of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). One of the responsibilities of the Vice President is to monitor the work of the Advisory Committee on Evidence-Based Practice.
Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a challenging but attainable goal for audiology and speech-language pathology. Our professions have made rapid progress in developing the foundations for EBP. To be sure, a great deal of work remains to be done, but we have learned from the experiences of other professions and have built our own systems to support EBP.
本评论是对南·伯恩斯坦·拉特纳的一篇配套论文(《循证实践:对言语语言病理学实践的影响审视》)的回应。
这些评论反映了我作为美国言语语言听力协会(ASHA)研究与技术副总裁的经历。副总裁的职责之一是监督循证实践咨询委员会的工作。
循证实践(EBP)对听力学和言语语言病理学来说是一个具有挑战性但可以实现的目标。我们的专业在为循证实践奠定基础方面取得了迅速进展。诚然,仍有大量工作要做,但我们从其他专业的经验中吸取了教训,并建立了自己的系统来支持循证实践。