Gotthardt M, Rubner C, Bauhofer A, Berce F, Oyen W J G, Goecke J, Pfestroff A, Schlieck A, Corstens F H, Béhé M, Behr T M
Department of Nuclear Medicine, St. Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmergen, The Netherlands.
Nuklearmedizin. 2006;45(5):206-12.
Dose calculation for radioiodine therapy (RIT) of multifocal autonomies (MFA) is a problem as therapeutic outcome may be worse than in other kinds of autonomies. We compared different dosimetric concepts in our patients.
PATIENTS, METHODS: Data from 187 patients who had undergone RIT for MFA (Marinelli algorithm, volumetric compromise) were included in the study. For calculation, either a standard or a measured half-life had been used and the dosimetric compromise (150 Gy, total thyroid volume). Therapeutic activities were calculated by 2 alternative concepts and compared to therapeutic success achieved (concept of TcTUs-based calculation of autonomous volume with 300 Gy and TcTUs-based adaptation of target dose on total thyroid volume).
If a standard half-life is used, therapeutic success was achieved in 90.2% (hypothyroidism 23,1%, n = 143). If a measured half-life was used the success rate was 93.1% (13,6% hypothyroidism, n = 44). These differences were statistically not significant, neither for all patients together nor for subgroups eu-, hypo-, or hyperthyroid after therapy (ANOVA, all p > 0.05). The alternative dosimetric concepts would have resulted either in significantly lower organ doses (TcTUs-based calculation of autonomous volume; 80.76 +/- 80.6 Gy versus 125.6 +/- 46.3 Gy; p < 0.0001) or in systematic over-treatment with significantly higher doses (TcTUs-adapted concept; 164.2 +/- 101.7 Gy versus 125.6 +/- 46.3 Gy; p = 0.0097).
TcTUsbased determination of the autonomous volume should not be performed, the TcTUs-based adaptation of the target dose will only increase the rate of hypothyroidism. A standard half-life may be used in pre-therapeutic dosimetry for RIT of MFA. If so, individual therapeutic activities may be calculated based on thyroid size corrected to the 24h ITUs without using Marinelli's algorithm.
多灶自主性(MFA)放射性碘治疗(RIT)的剂量计算是一个问题,因为其治疗效果可能比其他类型的自主性更差。我们在患者中比较了不同的剂量学概念。
患者、方法:本研究纳入了187例接受MFA的RIT治疗(Marinelli算法,体积折衷法)的患者数据。计算时,使用了标准半衰期或测量半衰期以及剂量学折衷值(150 Gy,甲状腺总体积)。通过两种替代概念计算治疗活度,并与所取得的治疗成功情况进行比较(基于TcTUs计算自主性体积并设定300 Gy的概念,以及基于TcTUs根据甲状腺总体积调整靶剂量的概念)。
如果使用标准半衰期,90.2%的患者取得了治疗成功(甲状腺功能减退23.1%,n = 143)。如果使用测量半衰期,成功率为93.1%(甲状腺功能减退13.6%,n = 44)。这些差异在统计学上不显著,无论是对于所有患者整体,还是对于治疗后甲状腺功能正常、减退或亢进的亚组(方差分析,所有p > 0.05)。替代剂量学概念要么会导致器官剂量显著降低(基于TcTUs计算自主性体积;80.76±80.6 Gy对125.6±46.3 Gy;p < 0.0001),要么会导致系统性过度治疗,剂量显著更高(基于TcTUs调整的概念;164.2±101.7 Gy对125.6±46.3 Gy;p = 0.0097)。
不应基于TcTUs确定自主性体积,基于TcTUs调整靶剂量只会增加甲状腺功能减退的发生率。在MFA的RIT治疗前剂量测定中可使用标准半衰期。如果这样做,可以根据校正到24小时碘摄取单位(ITUs)的甲状腺大小计算个体治疗活度,而无需使用Marinelli算法。