Suppr超能文献

生殖选择:筛查政策与获得生殖手段的途径。

Reproductive choice: screening policy and access to the means of reproduction.

作者信息

Vandervort Lucinda

机构信息

College of Law, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

出版信息

Hum Rights Q. 2006 May;28(2):438-64. doi: 10.1353/hrq.2006.0023.

Abstract

The practice of screening potential users of reproductive services is of profound social and political significance. Access screening lacks a defensible rationale, is inconsistent with the principles of equality and self-determination, and violates individual and group human rights. Communities that strive to function in accord with those principles should not permit access to screening, even screening that purports to be a benign exercise of professional discretion. Because reproductive choice is controversial, regulation by law my be required in most jurisdictions to provide effective protection for reproductive rights. In Canada, for example, equal access can, and should be, guaranteed by federal regulations imposing strict conditions on the licenses of fertility clinics.

摘要

对生殖服务潜在用户进行筛查的做法具有深远的社会和政治意义。准入筛查缺乏合理依据,不符合平等和自决原则,侵犯了个人和群体的人权。努力按照这些原则运作的社区不应允许进行准入筛查,即使是那种声称是专业酌情权的良性行使的筛查。由于生殖选择存在争议,在大多数司法管辖区可能需要通过法律进行监管,以有效保护生殖权利。例如,在加拿大,平等准入可以而且应该通过联邦法规来保障,这些法规对生育诊所的执照施加严格条件。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验