Dickstein Steven G, Bannon Katie, Castellanos F Xavier, Milham Michael P
NYU Child Study Center, New York, NY 10016, USA.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006 Oct;47(10):1051-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01671.x.
Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most prevalent and commonly studied forms of psychopathology in children and adolescents. Causal models of ADHD have long implicated dysfunction in fronto-striatal and frontal-parietal networks supporting executive function, a hypothesis that can now be examined systematically using functional neuroimaging. The present work provides an objective, unbiased statistically-based meta-analysis of published functional neuroimaging studies of ADHD.
A recently developed voxel-wise quantitative meta-analytic technique known as activation likelihood estimation (ALE) was applied to 16 neuroimaging studies examining and contrasting patterns of neural activity in patients with ADHD and healthy controls. Voxel-wise results are reported using a statistical threshold of p < .05, corrected. Given the large number of studies examining response inhibition, additional meta-analyses focusing specifically on group differences in the neural correlates of inhibition were included.
Across studies, significant patterns of frontal hypoactivity were detected in patients with ADHD, affecting anterior cingulate, dorsolateral prefrontal, and inferior prefrontal cortices, as well as related regions including basal ganglia, thalamus, and portions of parietal cortex. When focusing on studies of response inhibition alone, a more limited set of group differences were observed, including inferior prefrontal cortex, medial wall regions, and the precentral gyrus. In contrast, analyses focusing on studies of constructs other than response inhibition revealed a more extensive pattern of hypofunction in patients with ADHD than those of response inhibition.
To date, the most consistent findings in the neuroimaging literature of ADHD are deficits in neural activity within fronto-striatal and fronto-parietal circuits. The distributed nature of these results fails to support models emphasizing dysfunction in any one frontal sub-region. While our findings are suggestive of the primacy of deficits in frontal-based neural circuitry underlying ADHD, we discuss potential biases in the literature that need to be addressed before such a conclusion can be fully embraced.
注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)是儿童和青少年中最普遍且研究最多的精神病理学形式之一。ADHD的因果模型长期以来一直认为支持执行功能的额纹状体和额顶叶网络存在功能障碍,这一假设现在可以通过功能神经成像进行系统研究。本研究对已发表的ADHD功能神经成像研究进行了基于统计学的客观、无偏元分析。
一种最近开发的体素水平定量元分析技术,即激活可能性估计(ALE),应用于16项神经成像研究,这些研究检查并对比了ADHD患者和健康对照者的神经活动模式。体素水平的结果采用p <.05的统计阈值报告,并进行了校正。鉴于有大量研究考察反应抑制,还纳入了专门关注抑制神经关联方面组间差异的额外元分析。
在各项研究中,ADHD患者检测到额叶活动减退的显著模式,影响前扣带回、背外侧前额叶和前额叶下部皮质,以及包括基底神经节、丘脑和部分顶叶皮质在内的相关区域。仅关注反应抑制研究时,观察到的组间差异范围更有限,包括前额叶下部皮质、内侧壁区域和中央前回。相比之下,关注除反应抑制之外其他结构研究的分析显示,ADHD患者的功能减退模式比反应抑制研究中的更为广泛。
迄今为止,ADHD神经成像文献中最一致的发现是额纹状体和额顶叶回路内神经活动存在缺陷。这些结果的分布性质不支持强调任何一个额叶亚区域功能障碍的模型。虽然我们的发现提示基于额叶的神经回路缺陷在ADHD中占首要地位,但我们讨论了文献中潜在的偏差,在完全接受这一结论之前需要加以解决。