Huang Jin-Long, Tai Ching-Tai, Liu Tu-Ying, Lin Yenn-Jiang, Lee Pi-Chang, Ting Chih-Tai, Chen Shih-Ann
Heart Failure Division, Cardiovascular Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006 Nov;17(11):1187-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00593.x.
Although the reentrant circuit of typical atrial flutter (AFL) has been well recognized, the activation around the Eustachian ridge (ER) has not been fully characterized. The aim of this study was to delineate the activation patterns around the ER during typical AFL using high-resolution noncontact mapping.
Fifty-three patients (M/F = 43/10, 62 +/- 14 years) with typical AFL were included. The high-resolution mapping of the right atrium using a noncontact mapping system during AFL and pacing from the coronary sinus (CS) was performed to evaluate the conduction through the ER.
Three types of activation patterns around the ER could be classified according to the ER conduction during AFL and CS pacing. Type I (n = 21, M/F = 16/5, 61 +/- 13 years) exhibited conduction block at the ER during AFL and CS pacing. The local unipolar electrograms at the ER exhibited long double potentials (DPs) (109 +/- 12 ms, range 77-153 ms) during AFL and CS pacing (84 +/- 18 ms, range 48-129 ms). Type II (n = 8, M/F = 7/1, 61 +/- 15 years) exhibited conduction block at the ER during AFL, but conduction through the ER during CS pacing. The unipolar electrograms exhibited long DPs (119 +/- 12 ms, range 97-141 ms) at the ER during the tachycardia and an rS pattern during CS pacing. Type III (n = 24, M/F = 20/4, 61 +/- 16 years) exhibited an activation wavefront that passed along the ER, with the sinus venosa as the posterior barrier during AFL. During CS pacing, all cases exhibited conduction through the ER with an rS pattern.
This study is the first to demonstrate the three patterns of activation along the ER during AFL and CS pacing. This finding suggested that the ER is an anatomic and functional barrier during typical AFL.
尽管典型心房扑动(AFL)的折返环路已得到充分认识,但围绕欧氏嵴(ER)的激动情况尚未完全明确。本研究旨在使用高分辨率非接触标测描绘典型AFL期间ER周围的激动模式。
纳入53例典型AFL患者(男/女 = 43/10,62±14岁)。在AFL期间使用非接触标测系统对右心房进行高分辨率标测,并从冠状窦(CS)进行起搏,以评估通过ER的传导。
根据AFL和CS起搏期间ER的传导情况,可将ER周围的激动模式分为三种类型。I型(n = 21,男/女 = 16/5,61±13岁)在AFL和CS起搏期间ER表现为传导阻滞。AFL和CS起搏期间(84±18毫秒,范围48 - 129毫秒),ER处的局部单极电图显示长双峰电位(DPs)(109±12毫秒,范围77 - 153毫秒)。II型(n = 8,男/女 = 7/1,61±15岁)在AFL期间ER表现为传导阻滞,但在CS起搏期间通过ER传导。心动过速期间ER处的单极电图显示长DPs(119±12毫秒,范围97 - 141毫秒),CS起搏期间呈rS图形。III型(n = 24,男/女 = 20/4,61±16岁)在AFL期间表现为激动波前沿着ER传导,以腔静脉窦作为后屏障。在CS起搏期间,所有病例均通过ER传导,呈rS图形。
本研究首次展示了AFL和CS起搏期间沿ER的三种激动模式。这一发现表明ER在典型AFL期间是一个解剖和功能屏障。