Liu Ping, Foster Grover, Labadie Robert, Somoza Eugene, Sharma Amarnath
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Pfizer Global Research and Development, 50 Pequot Avenue, New London, CT 06320, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Jan;51(1):110-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00559-06. Epub 2006 Oct 30.
This trial was aimed to estimate the pharmacokinetic interaction between voriconazole and methadone at steady state in male patients on methadone therapy and to characterize the safety and tolerability profile during the coadministration. Twenty-three patients on individualized methadone therapy (30 to 100 mg once daily) were enrolled into this randomized, patient- and investigator-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Methadone pharmacokinetic samples were collected from patients receiving methadone alone as the baseline before they were randomized to coadminister either 200 mg voriconazole twice daily (BID) (400-mg BID loading doses on the first day) (n = 16) or matching placebo (n = 7) for the next 5 days. Pharmacokinetic samples for methadone and voriconazole were collected on the last day of voriconazole dosing. The safety data were collected throughout the study. Voriconazole increased the steady-state exposure of pharmacologically active enantiomer (R)-methadone: the mean area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24)) was increased by 47.2% (90% confidence intervals [CI]: 37.7%, 57.4%), and the mean peak concentration (C(max)) was increased by 30.7% (90% CI: 22.2%, 39.8%). The magnitude of increase in (S)-methadone exposure was greater than that of (R)-methadone: the AUC(0-24) was increased by 103.4% (90% CI: 85.0%, 123.6%), and the C(max) was increased by 65.4% (90% CI: 52.6%, 79.2%). Methadone appeared to have no effect on the steady-state voriconazole pharmacokinetics compared to the historical data for voriconazole alone. Methadone patients receiving voriconazole showed no signs or symptoms of significant opioid withdrawal or overdose. Coadministration of 200 mg voriconazole BID with methadone was generally safe and well tolerated. Nevertheless, caution should be exercised when voriconazole is coadministered with methadone due to the increase in (R)-methadone exposure, which in turn may require a dose reduction of methadone.
本试验旨在评估在接受美沙酮治疗的男性患者中,伏立康唑与美沙酮在稳态时的药代动力学相互作用,并描述联合用药期间的安全性和耐受性特征。23例接受个体化美沙酮治疗(每日一次,30至100mg)的患者被纳入这项随机、患者和研究者双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究。在患者被随机分组接受为期5天的每日两次200mg伏立康唑(第一天给予400mg每日两次的负荷剂量)(n = 16)或匹配的安慰剂(n = 7)联合用药之前,收集单独接受美沙酮治疗患者的美沙酮药代动力学样本作为基线。在伏立康唑给药的最后一天收集美沙酮和伏立康唑的药代动力学样本。在整个研究过程中收集安全性数据。伏立康唑增加了具有药理活性的对映体(R)-美沙酮的稳态暴露:0至24小时浓度-时间曲线下的平均面积(AUC(0-24))增加了47.2%(90%置信区间[CI]:37.7%,57.4%),平均峰浓度(C(max))增加了30.7%(90%CI:22.2%,39.8%)。(S)-美沙酮暴露的增加幅度大于(R)-美沙酮:AUC(0-24)增加了103.4%(90%CI:85.0%,123.6%),C(max)增加了65.4%(90%CI:52.6%,79.2%)。与单独使用伏立康唑的历史数据相比,美沙酮似乎对伏立康唑的稳态药代动力学没有影响。接受伏立康唑的美沙酮患者未出现明显的阿片类药物戒断或过量的体征或症状。每日两次200mg伏立康唑与美沙酮联合用药总体上是安全的且耐受性良好。然而,由于(R)-美沙酮暴露增加,伏立康唑与美沙酮联合用药时应谨慎,这反过来可能需要减少美沙酮的剂量。