Suppr超能文献

围手术期专科从业者:发展并评估一种新的外科角色。

The perioperative specialist practitioner: developing and evaluating a new surgical role.

作者信息

Kneebone R, Nestel D, Chrzanowska J, Barnet A E, Younger J, Burgess A, Darzi A

机构信息

Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Chancellor's Teaching Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, UK.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Oct;15(5):354-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.017509.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This paper describes the design, implementation and evaluation of a new professional role in surgery. The role of the perioperative specialist practitioner (PSP), conceived as a response to the Working Time Directive, provides integrated preoperative and postoperative care to patients undergoing surgery in hospital.

METHODS

A 1-year training programme was designed, dealing with a wide range of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Effective communication was a key component. Nine intensive 5-day modules at Imperial College London (London, UK) alternated with supervised experience of the surgical team at each participant's home trust. Detailed evaluation of the role and the training programme was provided by an independent research team, using an interview-based qualitative approach. Observational data were provided by the project team. Data were analysed using standard qualitative methods.

RESULTS

27 PSPs across 12 National Health Service trusts took part in two PSP training programmes. A total of 124 interviews (94 individual and 30 group) were carried out with PSPs and their colleagues. Overall, the role was seen as successful and positive, with great potential for dealing with reductions in junior medical cover. Each site encountered different opportunities and problems. Lack of mentorship was a key issue, and the role provoked considerable opposition in trusts. The training programme was viewed as highly successful.

DISCUSSION

PSPs can provide high levels of expertise, but within clear limits. Our training programme has been effective and is perceived to be of high quality. However, introducing a new role requires time and sensitivity if opposition is to be minimised.

摘要

引言

本文描述了外科领域一个新的专业角色的设计、实施与评估。围手术期专科医生(PSP)这一角色的设立是为了响应《工作时间指令》,为在医院接受手术的患者提供综合的术前和术后护理。

方法

设计了一个为期一年的培训项目,涵盖广泛的知识、技能和态度。有效的沟通是关键组成部分。在英国伦敦帝国理工学院进行九个为期五天的强化模块培训,同时参与者在各自所在的信托医院的手术团队中接受带教实践。一个独立的研究团队采用基于访谈的定性方法对该角色和培训项目进行了详细评估。项目团队提供了观察数据。使用标准的定性方法对数据进行了分析。

结果

来自12个国民医疗服务信托机构的27名围手术期专科医生参加了两个围手术期专科医生培训项目。共对围手术期专科医生及其同事进行了124次访谈(94次个人访谈和30次小组访谈)。总体而言,该角色被视为成功且积极的,在应对初级医疗人员减少方面具有巨大潜力。每个机构都遇到了不同的机遇和问题。缺乏导师指导是一个关键问题,并且该角色在信托机构中引发了相当大的反对意见。培训项目被认为非常成功。

讨论

围手术期专科医生能够提供高水平的专业知识,但有明确的限制。我们的培训项目是有效的,并且被认为质量很高。然而,如果要将反对意见降至最低,引入一个新角色需要时间和敏感度。

相似文献

1
The perioperative specialist practitioner: developing and evaluating a new surgical role.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Oct;15(5):354-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.017509.
2
Innovative training for new surgical roles--the place of evaluation.
Med Educ. 2006 Oct;40(10):987-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02558.x.
3
A National Health Service Hospital's cardiac rehabilitation programme: a qualitative analysis of provision.
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Oct;16(10):1908-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01815.x.
4
The London low emission zone baseline study.
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2011 Nov(163):3-79.
8
Communication with patients and colleagues.
Dan Med Bull. 2011 Dec;58(12):B4359.
9
Towards multidisciplinary assessment of older people: exploring the change process.
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Apr;14(4):518-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01085.x.
10
Promoting evidence-based care through a clinical research fellowship programme.
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Sep;16(9):1629-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01748.x.

引用本文的文献

2
Fast-track surgery: Toward comprehensive peri-operative care.
Anesth Essays Res. 2014 May-Aug;8(2):127-33. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.134474.
3
GPs, operations, and the community.
BMJ. 2007 Jan 6;334(7583):5-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39049.376829.43.

本文引用的文献

1
Innovative training for new surgical roles--the place of evaluation.
Med Educ. 2006 Oct;40(10):987-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02558.x.
2
Teaching communication skills for handover: perioperative specialist practitioners.
Med Educ. 2005 Nov;39(11):1157. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02303.x.
3
Evaluating clinical simulations for learning procedural skills: a theory-based approach.
Acad Med. 2005 Jun;80(6):549-53. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200506000-00006.
4
Blurring the boundaries: scenario-based simulation in a clinical setting.
Med Educ. 2005 Jun;39(6):580-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02110.x.
5
New professional roles in surgery.
BMJ. 2005 Apr 9;330(7495):803-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7495.803.
7
An innovative model for teaching and learning clinical procedures.
Med Educ. 2002 Jul;36(7):628-34. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01261.x.
9
Coping with complexity: educating for capability.
BMJ. 2001 Oct 6;323(7316):799-803. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7316.799.
10
Complexity science: complexity and clinical care.
BMJ. 2001 Sep 22;323(7314):685-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7314.685.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验